Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> ORDIMAMCS #949 - COAL CAM RAMS ZOWIMO - <br /> PUILIC ILZAkIlla Ordinance #949, "An ordinano• amending Title 17 of <br /> the Louisville Municipal Code entitled Zoning by <br /> Boning property commonly known as the Coal Creak <br /> Ranch.• Proper publication and notice of public, <br /> hearing were established. <br /> Mayor tauson opened the public hearing and asked <br /> that this item be continued until the February 16, <br /> 1988 meeting. <br /> Szymanski roved that the public bearing for <br /> Ordinanoe #949 be 000tinued to the February 16, 19&$ <br /> Council Matting. Acaspell„a seconded. My Soli CSIV. <br /> Vote, the public hearing on Ordinance #249 was :. <br /> continued to the 2.bruuy 10, 19S1 M.etief• <br /> Vote was 5-0-2 with1WWWmsan and Sackett pr.vio <br /> e*auaed from the proceedings. y: <br /> (Soderaon and Sackett rejoined the smiting. ) <br /> �► M WAS? - TSM ORAST <br /> SION Wanush explained that Mr. Mossoni is opening an Atilt <br /> Family Ssstaurant in Centennial Center on Cherry <br /> Street and is requesting • permit to place • sign on <br /> O.S. 36. Section 17.24.070D of the Louisville <br /> Municipal Code states: "Signs shall be permitted <br /> only on the same lot or lots of the permitted <br /> advertised use and only where clearly incidental, <br /> customary or coamaaly associated with the operation <br /> of the permitted use. Mir. Mossoni is requesting <br /> that a temporary sign be allowed for 120 - 240 days. <br /> Se is basing his request on the fact that the <br /> ordinance doss allow off premise signs for <br /> subdivisions that are in the process of building <br /> out. <br /> Given the present ordinance, the type of sign that <br /> he is requesting is not permitted and Council is not <br /> authorised to grant exceptions. If the Council <br /> wishes to consider Mr. Mossoni's request, it must be <br /> in the form of an amendment to the sign cods and <br /> this type of amendment would start with the Planning <br /> Commission. Staff is seeking direction from Council <br /> on whether such a change in the sign code should be <br /> contemplated. <br /> Mr. Monson' thanked Council for this opportunity to <br /> consider his request as outlined by Mr. Wanush. <br /> Williamson stated that as Wanush explained, the <br /> City's Code does not provide for any variances to <br /> the sign code, temporary or otherwise. Therefore, <br /> this would have to be done through an amendment to <br /> the sign cod• which would need to be referred to the <br /> 4 <br />