My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 03 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1988 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 03 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:59 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 11:11:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
3/1/1988
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1988 03 01
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 77175777- <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Council is a pro-business Council, quality iseued ; <br /> are equally important and sometimes require gyp', <br /> saying "no.' "i believe this is one of those t <br /> we should be saying no.' <br /> Anderson reminded Council that this Ordinance would <br /> change the zoning throughout the City in all <br /> residential neighborhoods by allowing this use. <br /> Carnival stated that it is his opinion that <br /> barber/beauty shops do not fit the same category et <br /> the other exclusions within the City's currentivielf <br /> time criteria. occlusions include antoAroe,# , <br /> weld and paint shops - tboae things that ax'x <br /> obviously offensive. Using day caure, ce.�ca;s , <br /> *xa e aple, Carnival stated that be f..l <br /> ameaciated with bar*r ty sbo s_ <br /> • 4 <br /> . . little impact 0 'UMI r. <br /> th permitted .care. casters. .Carte <br /> that be would support this Ordinance. <br /> Mohr closed the public hearing and called for s <br /> motion. 1 <br /> Carnival moved that Ordinance MO be adopted. <br /> Ocarpella seconded. <br /> Noble stated thet since be is veering two hats, bow .y <br /> saved his comments for now. Mohr stated that ids .t <br /> issue were strictly what other cities are doing, the <br /> changing needs in society of single parent need, the <br /> integrity of the applicant and the neighbors signing <br /> such a petition in support of this issue, Mohr would <br /> than indeed be able to support this Ordinance. • <br /> Mowsver, Mohr stated that the number one priority of <br /> this Council is economic development. Molar stated <br /> that 401 of economic development is the result oR <br /> the aspansias of existing businesses. Shoes <br /> existing barber/beauty shops located in <br /> commercial/business songs may reconsider their <br /> location based on rent in the business area. If <br /> each could pract:.ce within their own hoses, why pay <br /> rent in a business district and perform/conduct • <br /> business within • more stringent coning code. One <br /> business depends on all the other businesses around <br /> it because of the probability that people will <br /> conduct several transactions at one time. Although <br /> wbr stated that be was very empathetic to the <br /> reasons Ms. lincher initiated in bar request for <br /> this ordinance change, be feels that the bigger <br /> issue involves the issues he stated. Also, Mohr <br /> feels that there may be a problem in residential <br /> resale should a prospective buyer of a house prefer <br /> to not live in a neighborhood where • busies is <br /> being conducted. Mohr cannot support this Ordinanoe <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.