My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 09 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1988 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1988 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:59 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 11:27:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/20/1988
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1988 09 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Community Services would bring before Council a <br /> rehensive Fee* and Charges Policy in early <br /> 190 for review and adoption. <br /> Also, the Library Board recommends two fine <br /> increases and a typewriter usage fee increase. <br /> Pine increases include increasing the fine on <br /> overdue video cassettes to $2.00 per day for $1.00 ' <br /> per day to reduce the number of overdue videos and <br /> to make fees comparable to other area libraries. <br /> Also, an additional $1,00 fine► for books more than . <br /> three weeks overdue to cover the cost of <br /> overdue notices. A fee increase fro $1.00 per. : :. <br /> hour to $2.00 per hoer on typewriter usage will <br /> help to recover some maintenance costa. <br /> t' • i Syr ai <br /> Mohr asked Li1Ln .to t rwti. . w • }r.•, <br /> .14011 U. . -• ' <br /> ;tat4d tNit t f Moy►t � '' ► <br /> bopeer brtlreconret sore of VA costs <br /> aenoCieted. Witb aomit of the businesses that hove <br /> o • ., <br /> o paay parties. She groups are larger 125 pIi s 3' <br /> and therefore create more trash that must be takari.t" <br /> care of by the parks crew. Mohr <br /> this fee could be a fully refundable�ittif in <br /> fact these compaaie. completely cleaned--up all -the ' <br /> debris created by tbre party. Lillo agreed that <br /> this would be appropriate. : �+ <br /> Mohr also questioned the decision to not issue <br /> alcohol permits in parks. Stahl explained that ' <br /> the City would no longer be a *licensing group, <br /> permitting group' with respect to beer in City <br /> parks. Beer would still be permitted in the perk, <br /> but they would be signing an indemnification to <br /> the City. The City has no control as to whether <br /> minors are being served or not and therefore it <br /> does not seem appropriate that the City is in <br /> 'permitting situation" taking same possible <br /> liability. <br /> Ferrero stated that be agreed with Mohr's <br /> suggestions regarding the fee for resident <br /> business use of the City's parks. <br /> With no further comments, Mayor lauson called for <br /> a motion. Mobur waved that the fee schedule <br /> presented be approved with the modification on <br /> resident businesses being a $75 deposit fully <br /> refundable upon inspection by the City. Pourers <br /> seconded. Motion passed S-0. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.