Laserfiche WebLink
for a motion. <br /> MaYor Fausaa movrd ta adopt Crdinanc• �1031. <br /> ��ri�� 1940, sacondsd br Carnival. Br �011 Call <br /> Yc�• Ordinanc• �1031. Series 1990 ws• adapt�d 5�0. <br /> RESOLUTION #29, SBRI�� 1398 -]�►1d�NDMB�T TO �IH�L PUD DB�'ELQpMBNT <br /> �L]111 - COAL CR6LX R!►dCH FIL�HCi NO. 1. <br /> c3ritfiths r�ad by titt• aaly, R�solutivn Na. 24, <br /> "�► Re�olution approvinq an amendment to th� tinal <br /> P�D and developmsnt plan for Coal Cr��k Ranch." <br /> Franklin: Coal Cr��k hssoci�tea has c�qu�st�d �n am�ndm�nt <br /> to the Ein�rl PUD Develapment Plan tor Coal Croek <br /> Ranch. The purpoa• n� the am�ndm�nt ia to redur• <br /> th� rea�r yard a�tback t►�om 2S' to 20' in ar�aa "�^ <br /> and "D" and e�peciallr for lots which back up to <br /> th� qol # cours�. This cl�anq• Mi t 1 r�aul t in a <br /> unifor:n rear yard s�tback for sll sinqle faa�ilr <br /> daLach�d reaiden�:la1 parc�is. Plinninq C�n��a�ion <br /> did i�V1AM th� requsst and did r�to�nd appraval. <br /> HaW�cd: BY decce�si�q tha s�tbACk �+ould that allow th� <br /> dsv�lopar to put th• hom�s clos�r toq�th�r ar mak� <br /> thtm larqer than th�r would hav• b��n or is th�r� <br /> any war of qu�rant��inq that the cnlY u�t o� <br /> Waivinq thr �etback would be for th� us• o! d�cks. <br /> Fr�nklin: The majoritr ot lots that hav� bf rn •tfecttd br <br /> this hiv• been laid oul. w• hav• r�ceived ait• <br /> plans �ar th� lot�. If that is th• dfr�ctian Ax <br /> council, yes we can �o that. Th• huus�s are not <br /> �ffect�d by the �har��e, onlr th� deck�. <br /> Oavidaon: Acs �nr ot thea� hom�s in an �r�• that is qair.p ta � <br /> hav� an atfeet by reducinq th� s�tback br S feet't <br /> Prar.lcli�: Th• d�Cks will be no mor� e�:pes�d than thsY mt�ht <br /> b�. No it s�on't, <br /> Gounci 1 w�►nt�d to knaw exact 1 Y whaich 1 ots would <br /> b� affectad bx the chan4�. �'�lt that th• GaIE Pro <br /> sh�utd be contacted for his opi�ion abcut thR lat� <br /> atfeeted to s�• it that would hav♦ an eEffct an <br /> pl�r for th• cours� o� da�naQ� ta psopl�'s ?�oens�. <br /> Would like a rscommrndation Ero� Councilman <br /> sark��t on hoK wzrd III fe�ls about this i��u� and <br /> what ia r�a11y yoinQ on wlth �his issu�. <br /> �riffikhs: whtn th• rtsolutio�t waa rtviewld, I•xprfsi�rd eon� <br /> conc�rn that th� resolutiun did not id�ntlty th� <br /> sptcifia am�ndmtnt that �+a• ba�nq propo��d to th• <br /> PUD. t asic�d that it b� ccyis�d ta dtscrib� tli� <br /> sp�ci t i c amendm�r►t . Tht ar�tndm�nt ad3a a c 1�w• <br /> � <br />