My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 09 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 09 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:03:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/1/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 09 01
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson, oarwentinq an go. 7. "Frivato sector transit Carriers to <br /> establish satellite terminals....», L any cities have a downtown <br /> terminal which services all of the airlines. You actually heck in <br /> your baggage, got your seat assignment, for all practical purposes <br /> you're at the airport. The bur imsediately takes you close to the <br /> gate. Be felt that would be a more reasonable answer than <br /> expecting some private contractor to open some satellite torminal. <br /> Davidsop felt the way to get rid of traffic was with the downtown <br /> terminal concept. As the Resolution reads nor, it is going to <br /> encourage congestion or taking the RTD, neither of vhich Davidson <br /> felt were acceptable solutions. <br /> Sisk is concerned that with the PUC being in charge of the <br /> interstate business of transporting pasaengars. He stated that <br /> what the PVC does is encourage a monopoly. There is only one PUC <br /> license offered in boulder, between boulder County and Denver <br /> Stapleton Airport. This is contrary to oar pooling, <br /> tra"Portation, or any kind of competition. Sisk stated that <br /> Council rwreded to encourage alternative factors and airport <br /> transportation conianies, which will allow competitiveness and <br /> maximise the number at riders that mould go down. <br /> Haddingr Globally, with all of this, signing <br /> some kind of resolution *grteinq to <br /> enter into some planning process, <br /> does this mean we're signing up <br /> wbore some cost is involved? Is <br /> this a budget item? Doss this cost <br /> Louisville anytbinq? Do we give <br /> anything up in entering into this <br /> agreaaant? <br /> Nornbastelr At this point I don't know. I think <br /> they are trying to see it you too <br /> agrem in principle. I think if we <br /> siqn a resolution like this, we <br /> could be hold to it. If you could <br /> agree to the Resolution, that's <br /> fine. If not, I would be happy to <br /> forward the consents on to then. <br /> Heddings I have to apologize to the Council <br /> because I an the DRCOG <br /> representative for Louisville. <br /> Because I travel so frequently.. I've <br /> not been able to attend many of <br /> their functions and meeting*. I <br /> have a problem in general with DRCOG <br /> and some of the things that they <br /> have proposed. In particul+rr, with <br /> this concept. Is it possible to <br /> find an alternate for TJRCOG, so that <br /> 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.