Laserfiche WebLink
Sisk suggested doinq this in tars of resolution of support vith an <br /> agreement that the Resolution would not indicate any financial <br /> support without an aftirsativ• vote on Council's part. <br /> Annette dread, City Administrator, felt that if Council was going <br /> to have the interest of Louisville represented, they're going to <br /> need to have some staff time into that planning process. <br /> Hornbostelt It would be easier it Council just <br /> said that there was general support <br /> for it in a letter giving what the <br /> comments were. I think when they <br /> say "planning process ", they expect <br /> us to have staff time, to jump in <br /> fast first. This all came up at <br /> such short notice. Until we find <br /> out what the details are, I'm really <br /> uncomfortable with siqninq this <br /> resolution, because I don't know <br /> what they're doing yet. I have no <br /> problem with saying we agree with <br /> the concept. Specifically, we agree <br /> with the points of satellite <br /> terminals, mass transit, ground <br /> transportation, but we're worried <br /> about the cost affect, since there <br /> are no numbers attached to it. <br /> Sisk: Are you making 4a notion that we <br /> write a letter. <br /> Hornbostels Yes. <br /> Seconded by Sisk. <br /> Davidson: Are we moving and seconding that <br /> Margaret write a letter just as you <br /> described? <br /> Siskt Yes. <br /> All in favor. <br /> CITY ATTORM' S REPOR'! <br /> NONE <br /> CITY AXM"ISTR&TOR'S RSPORT <br /> NONE <br /> 32 <br />