Laserfiche WebLink
we're looking at 00 houses. <br /> Franklin: Up tp, in a full capacity scenario. <br /> There will be some park land and <br /> other things that will take away <br /> from that. <br /> Hornbostel: When we put all of these <br /> improvements in, you know they're <br /> going to develop the rest of the <br /> parcel /enclave, which means 90 <br /> houses. That has a real ispact on <br /> the schools. <br /> La throp: John, what is the minimum lot sire <br /> under RR? <br /> Franklin: Under RR you can have 20,000 sq. ft. <br /> lots and the RAR is five (5) acres <br /> or whatever the parcel size is that <br /> you end up with. <br /> Lathrop: If we took the majority of the <br /> walnut Street right-of-way out of <br /> your property, that would leave you <br /> a little bit over 2Q,000 sq. ft., <br /> which would allow you to build your <br /> home on the remaining parcel under <br /> an RR zoning. Mould that be an <br /> acceptable thing to you not knowing <br /> if you could put something together <br /> with the ac:joining property owner? <br /> I thought your intent was to build • <br /> house. <br /> Beaton: The discussions that we've had with <br /> the property owner to the north is <br /> that he is willing ..o swing the road <br /> his direction, so that we have in <br /> excess of 24,000 sq. ft. under an Ri <br /> zoning. It is our intent to build <br /> one house on that parcel. S Taco the <br /> zoning to the north is Rt, the <br /> zoning to the east is RL, we asked <br /> for 13 zoning. If the Council is <br /> conoernad that it opens up a <br /> Pandora's box and they're only <br /> willing to give up RR zoning, I <br /> guess we'll build one house there. <br /> Mayers .my recommendation wc.uld be to go <br /> with RR to the Planning Commission, <br /> i <br />