Laserfiche WebLink
including tourists who came downtown specifically for its historic district. She stated that even the <br />Los Angeles film crew who was filming for Quaker Oats filmed in downtown Louisville because it <br />was so much like small town America. She expressed concern for the lack of information she has <br />received as a DBA board member on what is intended for downtown. She expressed support for the <br />proposed Downtown Design Guidelines. <br /> <br />JeffKatz, 900 Main Street, Louisville, Colorado, stated that he feels the City is sitting on what could <br />be the next gold rush for downtown. He feels that if you don't build downtown, people will not come <br />downtown. He suggested that Council implement a parking plan now. He felt that stopping growth <br />downtown now would create a situation from which they could never recover. He predicted that the <br />immediate future of downtown depends upon what Council does tonight. <br /> <br />Jay Berger, 1016 Main Street, Louisville, Colorado, asked to present his view as a downtown resident. <br />As a member of the Downtown Design Guidelines Steering Committee, the citizen comments they <br />received indicated that residents liked the small town feel of Louisville, the scale of the structures, and <br />the pedestrian atmosphere. He felt that without the threat of a moratorium or restrictions regarding <br />parking and building heights, the business owners would not be in attendance tonight. He suggested <br />presenting the proposed parking plan at a public hearing for citizen comments prior to its adoption. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Sisk asked to provide a brief synopsis of the proposed ordinance limiting the building height in the <br />downtown commercial district to twenty-seven feet. He stated that he is opposed to a moratorium but <br />feels Council should preserve the historic nature of downtown Louisville. He said that he had an <br />opportunity to view the video tape from the August 4, 1998, Council meeting. During that meeting, <br />Levihn commented that he did not want to see buildings along Main Street reach a point where they <br />would only allow the sun to shine through from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and Sisk agreed with Levihn. <br /> <br />Lathrop agreed with Jay Berger's comments and does not feel a moratorium is the answer. He stated <br />that the owners of Business Answers are not prepared to get started immediately yet they appear to <br />be pressing Council for a quick decision. He stated that the business community appears to be coming <br />together and making progress on parking issues. He is hesitant to make a quick decision due to lack <br />of information or from pressure to do so. <br /> <br />Howard asked to address an earlier question on why retail use is being excluded from the parking <br />discussions. He stated that current parking is adequate for retail, as that use is transient; however, <br />office users occupy a parking space all day. Howard stated that he is not in favor of moratoriums <br />either. <br /> <br />Levihn stated that he has long been opposed to any building in downtown until solutions for parking, <br />height limit and design guidelines have been adopted. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />