City Council Agenda and Packet 1994 03 01

Home Browse Search

directly to Spruce Street. Lot 7 fronts Pins Street with access by an existing curb cut an Pins Street. Lots 2 and 3 access Spruce Straet via Outlot A. Outlot A is proposed as a 20' wide private Lire Ions maintained by the owners of Lots 2 and 3. Outlot a is the 15; land dedication. Planning Commission's recommendation was that the subdivider be responsible tar the maintenance of Outlot a. At Planning Commission's public hearing on February a, 1496, they approved Resolution No. 3 by a vote of 7 - 0 with eight conditions of approval (SEE ATTACHED). Conditions 4 - t have bean completed by the applicant. This Resolution No. 16 had three conditions of approval (SIM ATTACHED). OaNidson called for the applicant's presentation. So!• Grolsch, representing applicant Terry Kristovich, stated concerning outlot s being maintained by the homeowner's _ association, that with an outlot of this size and there being no hoseowner's association, it didn't seem worthwhile to establish a � - hos,sowner's association to maintain a xariscaped piece of ground. On the cost of developing Spruce Street, the public improvements �- ars estimated to be $160,000. He received an estimate of $231,000 for the development of Spruce, which does not include the cost of burying the utility lines currently along West Spruce Street, an rddsd $30 - $40,000. He asked Council if they would be interested in vcrking with Public Works and pay halt of the pc:blic improvement - cost for the City of Louisville and look for the recovery in future — doN el opment . r Da%idson called for Council comments and Questions. —` Hovard wanted some trees on Outlot B. He was reluctant to have taxpayers money up- fronted for the West Spruce Street improvements. He felt the burden of development should fall on the developer. Lathrop felt the developtir should be responsible for their development and all associated costs thereof. -� Major wondered about the on -sits detention. Toni rhare, Public works Director, stated detention would bs taken ca :e of within the pro3ect. It will discharge to Pine Street. �- Grclech stated Lot 6 would take care of any drainage. Major wondered who would maintain the 20' landscape and drainage ss� sas*Mont. Grc1sch: It will be the responsibility of the homeowner to maintain. Mayer wondered about the diffizultios of a shared driveway. f t � '�� 'fib 1 � � _� . f.. '�� .�.1 •t ..""r ` • h '� •. � `�•F. �... '.t ~�.' ... _� �'Ci � _ N•. ', .L . "n.