City Council Agenda and Packet 1994 09 20

Home Browse Search

'- APPROVAL 4 W CXXTI NI" Pdifk eau aaXZK# APA*Z XWr afigsrASIMM � AQVXMMW Sisk wond..ed why there would be such a significant reduction in the amount of guarantee from 1150 to 151 duo to the minimum amount laprovaments associated with the developments. He wanted to know the dollars involved. _ Peter Mornkamp, Plattner, stated that it was reduced at the request of the applicant. )formally, there is a Subdivision improvements Agreement that covers the public improvements. In this particular case, .both sites ware already platted, so there was not the normal subdivision agreweent. There wore some public improvements that were necessary a3 part of thin project, so staff felt that it was appropriate that a development agreement, similar tc the normal subdivision agreement, be prepared to insure those costs. He explained that in looking at the requested reduction, one thing the City insisted upon was that no Certificates of occupancy (C.O.) shall be issued by the Euildinq Division prior to construction � acceptance of the public improvements, which is contained in the Development A;roemont. Page 3, X.G. With regard to the dollar amounts, the city engineer had reviewed the proposed Exhibit B. Thera are some adjustmants and corrections that will need to be made to that for the final document. one of the comments was to provide sub - totals and totals on Phase I, Centennial Park, the total amount being $44,000 +. There was not an inclusion or the public sidewalks in the adjacent right -of -way, which will need to �- be added and for any landscaping that needs to be inc.udsi i« the OEM- right--~t-way. The total on Exhibit a is approximately $65,500, which wo�ild be Lncteased to reflect &ublic sidewalks. sisk: Have we bean doing this with other developments? Concerning Ponderosa Pines, I think the city did not do a s good job in administering that subdivision. I hate to sea us get ourselves into a position or looking at these developments on an ad hoc basis. I took it, when the fi development came in, that the developers agreed to pay 1150. That was knowr 7oinq in. I trust that that's boor. our policy. Jim Loftus, 2450 Willow Croak Drive, Boulder, Colorado, a partner in the project, stated that he didn't think there was ever any �- A significant discussions about putting up an I.C. It was never considered a major issue. They approached the Planning Department about a reduction in the LC because everything that they're doing that has to do with utilities and righte -nt -way in the city they're doing right now. They will be done with a•L1 of the water and sever lines in three weeks. So, their g= .estion was, it they are going to lI MEM •. ��"" . T om. ,;3� ►„ .ir •i.. ,�t. n.. "FV ' 1 r �'.i �. ^ aR , �'.f..'eSf�{ may - �,�• . .A 1 r � ♦.. �_ 1'.t h. R `k • +T'` �t`R ' `y;,f� ��'�l��M��`�A i'� ��'.i � y i. �' ' k * Y �1'.' J . }