My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1994 09 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1994 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1994 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:07 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 4:01:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
9/20/1994
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1994 09 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Once that's dons the guarantee <br /> period runs for a year. At that — <br /> point they need to carry 15t of the <br /> public improvements as a warranty <br /> quarantaa. We do have some - <br /> prov:sions or. prcjacts that if <br /> they're under way, and it makes — <br /> sense, and we do have time, that we <br /> will review interim reductions in <br /> latter of credit provided work is <br /> substantir!+:s in compliance. — <br /> Because many times we can't accept a <br /> water line until we krw the street <br /> on top is built properly and the <br /> valves are there, we don't <br /> necessarily give then acceptance. <br /> We just acknowledge completion and = <br /> compliance with our general <br /> standards. That in a nutshell is <br /> our public improvement review <br /> PC *as. <br /> kayer wondered what constituted a public improvement in this case. <br /> Phare: A simple d& inition of a public �-- <br /> Improvement is any facility that <br /> will be ultimately owned and <br /> maintained by the city. <br /> Howard was concerned that he was sander the impression that staff <br /> was recommending one course of action and new, at this meatinq, <br /> •h ±u we re recommending a different course of action. He wanted <br /> staff to give his their true recosaandation. Est <br /> Brands Peter (Kernkamp), I asked you if you <br /> would check with Public Works to <br /> verify the numbers that were <br /> recommended by Paul Wood. Did you <br /> w checu with Public Works? what were <br /> you told? <br /> Kernkamp: That he didn't have a problem with <br /> _ what was contained in hams. I <br /> didn't get any indication that there <br /> was a problem. : <br /> Brand: Tom (Phare), if you.... <br /> ?hare: I had the same conversation and I'm INK <br /> sorry, but that message wasn't <br /> received by me. <br /> smarm <br /> 16 � <br /> svE <br /> _ t I n y cam. +4` ,S � • a� s '�`� ;x^ti.'yp. 1 . :q , y , ; .�� - •l.'� � - _1,ts 'j 4 Y,� �•, •' ''¢ +o �•,• }� <br /> = yam► - .+ ' i � .� _ '��! r�� � ��� � y'S' �i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.