My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 05 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 05 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 10:48:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2010 05 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />Lewis expressed her involvement with this project in that she provided design <br />assistance. <br /> <br />Gary Rothenburg stated the L-shape of the proposed design allows for a private <br />backyard. <br /> <br />Stewart stated the connection to the existing house is pretty minimal and asked if <br />this compromised the floor plan. <br /> <br />Rothenburg stated there is not a compromise required. <br /> <br />Stewart asked if there was going to be a garage. <br /> <br />Rothenburg stated there will be a garage and the acceSS~S:.1 come from the <br />alley. ~ <br /> <br />Stewart recommended using some of the archite~I~, " the existing <br />building for th~ new bU.ilding to tie them ~~ge,et} . ~ . <br /> <br />Muckle asked If they tried to run the addltlo/,t"he same dlrectIO[l~(r:oofllne) as <br />the existing building. < \. ^ <br /> <br />Rotheburg answered yes but they wanted to cr~~ backyard. <br /> <br />Poppitz stated he liked the project...and reco~end~to create a false gable over <br />the front door of the new additiO\ ~ ~ ""'- <br /> <br />Muckle asked for them to please ~t~hth~2xisting r0~p.itch. <br /> <br />Koertje asked if this needs..to come ba<<:;k to HP~~t~ ~dition. <br />/~, ~V/ '" <br />McCartney stated only,if 50%f) more of tt-1e walls or roof are removed. <br /> <br />Pre-filing conf4~e - 70yMain Stre~~d Waveform building) <br />The a~pl.icant, Chaa~h.P.!ge~,..~.p~~~tation of wh~t he .~ould like to d~ to <br />the b'r:!Q""(btJtdoor patlo$:nopy over..~0iilon of the patio, railing around patio). <br /> <br /> <br />gas..~on look. '\ <br />Poppitz ~eed. ) <br />Lewis mad~'::-r~lng suggestions: <br />. Look at ~~s to see what is vital to save and what is not. <br /> <br />. Consider rollup windows <br /> <br />. Consider using light and removable awnings so that the building can be <br />brought back to original form. <br /> <br />Sholders answered he expects to only use items that can be removed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.