Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Gifts and Nepotism <br />The Code of Ethics, as well as state law, regulates <br />the receipt of gifts. City officials and employees may <br />not solicit or accept a present or future gift, favor, <br />discount, service or other thing of value from a party <br />to a City contract, or from a person seeking to influ- <br />ence an official action. There is an exception for the <br />"occasional nonpecuniary gift" of $15 or less, but <br />this exception does not apply if the gift, no matter <br />how small, may be associated with the official's or <br />employee's official action, whether concerning a <br />contract or some other matter. The gift ban also ex- <br />tends to independent contractors who may exercise <br />official actions on behalf of the City. <br /> <br />The Code of Ethics also prohibits common forms <br />of nepotism. For example, no officer, public body <br />member, or employee shall be responsible for em- <br />ployment matters concerning a relative. Nor can he <br />or she influence compensation paid to a relative, and <br />a relative of a current officer, public body member or <br />employee cannot be hired unless certain personnel <br />rules are followed. <br /> <br />Other Ethics Rules of Interest <br />Like state law, Louisville's Code of Ethics prohibits the <br />use of non-public information for personal or private <br />gain. It also prohibits acts of advantage or favoritism <br />and, in that regard, prohibits special considerations, <br />use of employee time for personal or private reasons, <br />and use of City vehicles or equipment, except in <br />same manner as available to any other person (or in <br />manner that will substantially benefit City). The City <br />also has a "revolving door" rule that prohibits elected <br />officials from becoming City employees either dur- <br />ing their time in office or for two years after leaving <br />office. These and other rules of conduct are found in <br />Section 5-9 of the Code of Ethics. <br /> <br />Disclosure, Enforcement, and Advisory Opinions <br />The Code of Ethics requires that those holding or <br />running for City Council file a financial disclosure <br />statement with the City Clerk. The statement must <br />include, among other information, the person's em- <br />ployer and occupation, sources of income, and a list <br />of business and property holdings. <br /> <br />The Code of Ethics provides fair and certain proce- <br />dures for its enforcement. Complaints of violations <br />may be filed with the City prosecutor; the complaint <br />must be a detailed written and verified statement. <br /> <br />If the complaint is against an elected or appointed <br />official, it is forwarded to an independent judge <br />who appoints a special, independent prosecutor for <br />purposes of investigation and appropriate action. If <br />against an employee, the City prosecutor will inves- <br />tigate the complaint and take appropriate action. In <br />all cases, the person who is subject to the complaint <br />is given the opportunity to provide information con- <br />cerning the complaint. <br /> <br />Finally, the Code allows persons who are subject to <br />the Code to request an advisory opinion if they are <br />uncertain as to applicability of the Code to a particu- <br />lar situation, or as to the definition of terms used in <br />the Code. Such requests are handled by an advisory <br />judge, selected from a panel of independent, disin- <br />terested judges who have agreed to provide their <br />services. This device allows persons who are subject <br />to the Code to resolve uncertainty before acting, so <br />that a proper course of conduct can be identified. <br />Any person who requests and acts in accordance <br />with an advisory opinion issued by an advisory judge <br />is not subject to City penalty, unless material facts <br />were omitted or misstated in the request. Advisory <br />opinions are posted for public inspection; the advi- <br />sory judge may order a delay in posting if the judge <br />determines the delay is in the City's best interest. <br /> <br />Citizens are encouraged to direct to the City Man- <br />ager's Office any questions they may have about the <br />City's Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code is available <br />on-line at the City's web site at www.LouisvilleCo.gov <br />and also available at the Offices of the City Manager <br />and City Clerk. <br /> <br />Other laws on Citizen Participation <br />in Government <br /> <br />Deceding sections of this pamphlet describe Louisville's own <br />r pradices intended to further citizen participation in government. <br />Those pradices are generally intended to further dissemination of <br />information and participation in the governing process. Some other <br />laws of interest regarding citizen participation include: <br /> <br />Initiative and Referendum <br />The right to petition for municipal legislation is <br />reserved to the citizens by the Colorado Constitu- <br />tion and the City Charter. An initiative is a petition <br />for legislation brought directly by the citizens; a <br />referendum is a petition brought by the citizens to <br />-7- <br />