Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-_.. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />from everybody who participated? <br /> <br />Baysinger: What we can do is code them differently by <br />color or by number and do just a sampling of <br />what we do on our door-to-door and then do a <br />combination of the ones that the people have <br />voluntarily filled out. Then separate out the <br />ones that have been voluntarily filled out at <br />the locations. <br /> <br />Mayor Fauson moved to approve the Parks Master Plan Survey, <br />seconded by Sackett. All in favor. <br /> <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - BOULDER COUNTY 1992 STATE HIGHWAY <br />RECOMMENDATION - PUBLIC WORKS <br /> <br />Tom Phare, Director of Public Works stated that annually the State <br />Highway Department solicits recommendations from counties for <br />projects within their jurisdiction. Boulder County in turn has <br />asked local governments for input on project recommendations. <br />Boulder County has requested the City of Louisville to provide any <br />recommendations. The last two or three years the City of <br />Louisville has focused its recommendations on 96th Street as a <br />connection to Highway 42 in a long term and as an interchange in <br />itself. The City has also endorsed recommendations for shoulder <br />improvements on State Highway 170, the road from McCaslin to 93, <br />which leads into Eldorado Springs and is part of the Mobile Bismark <br />bicycle course. The City of Louisville has been sensitive to that <br />because the City has employees who travel that route in vehicles. <br />We also have a waterplant site that is adjacent and long term the <br />City would like to see that as safe as possible. <br /> <br />Attached (attachment A) are projects recommended by the County to <br />the Highway Department based on input from all cities and local <br />governments as well as private interest groups. The Highway <br />Department does not have the financial resources to undertake all <br />these projects and it takes a number of years for cities to work <br />their way up on the priority list. The City is reestablishing its <br />priority and is asking that it be kept in the hopper for future <br />activities. It could happen that the City would have to undertake <br />a project that it has recommended because it becomes the city's <br />priority before the State Highway Department's. <br /> <br />Davidson: Since it takes a long time from when you first <br />recommend a road improvement until the State <br />finally does something, I wonder if it <br />wouldn't behoove us to also include Colorado <br />42 as it runs north/south to Louisville for <br />improvement. <br /> <br />Phare: Would that be second priority to 96th Street <br /> <br />4 <br />