My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 1:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/20/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> complete the project. It is a vacant piece of undeveloped <br /> ground and there are no City services up to the property. <br /> Hopefully, we will have everything completed in the next 8 or <br /> 9 weeks in order to provide occupancy to K-Mart by December <br /> Z4 of this year. The reason this is different from other projects <br /> is that it is a commercial project. You are not concerned about <br /> residences not being served. We have K- Mart and King <br /> Soopers who have been looking over our shoulders making <br /> sure we complete everything to their standards or better. We <br /> have the City, who will be inspecting and reviewing everything. <br /> We also have our construction lender. The developer in this <br /> business has almost become a conduit, everyone else is making <br /> sure you do your job for you. In the past we have done quality <br /> projects and have always completed and done everything that <br /> we have proposed to do. With K-Mart, if we don't have the <br /> public improvements, the City doesn't have to issue us the <br /> CO.. It is mandatory that we get all the public improvements <br /> in. We have met with the City Auditor and City Manager to <br /> review personal financial statements. You have a copy of the <br /> letter addressing that question. I would like to thank the City <br /> Council for working with us on this issue and spending a great <br /> deal of time working with our construction lender. With the <br /> new federal regulations concerning real estate, just getting a <br /> construction loan is difficult. I would appreciate if you would <br /> approve the amended subdivision agreement tonight. <br />Griffiths: The City requires as part of its standard subdivision agreement <br /> that a developer provide either a letter of credit or cash to <br /> guarantee the public improvements as part of the subdivision. <br /> What is being suggested here is an alternative to that, an <br /> amendment to the standard subdivision agreement which would <br /> provide for a letter of assurance from the lender, the Valley <br /> National Bank of Arizona. Essentially what this does is set <br /> aside the portion of the loan proceeds dedicated to payment of <br /> the public improvements. Those portions of the loan proceeds <br /> would not be paid to the borrower, Louisville Plaza, Inc., until <br /> such time as the City states that the improvements were <br /> constructed to the satisfaction of the City, in accordance with <br /> the subdivision agreement. If the borrower for some reason <br /> does not fulfill the obligations under the subdivision agreement <br /> by December 24, 1991, then the City will have the opportunity <br /> to utilize the remaining loan proceeds to complete those <br /> improvements. This letter of assurance is not of the same <br /> quality or will not provide the same level of protection to the <br /> City as does the letter of credit or cash. I was authorized to <br /> work with the bank, developer, auditor, and City staff to come <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.