My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 1:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/20/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />interest will be at the highest rate, that the City could have earned prior to the <br />reimbursement of that interest. We clarified that no certificate of occupancy would be <br />issued to any future owner 9f the property or any successor until all of the improvements <br />are completed and the City has been reimbursed all of the costs and expenses it has <br />incurred in completing any of the improvements or enforcing the agreement. One of the <br />fundamental protection that,the City has underlying in all of the subdivision agreements <br />is that it will not issue any certificate of occupancy for the buildings until such time as all <br />of the public improvements have been installed to the satisfaction of the City. If for some <br />reason the developer leaves town, any successive owner of the property cannot receive a <br />certificate of occupancy until such time as those improvements are in and completed to the <br />satisfaction of the City. The letter of assurance will be provided by the Valley National <br />Bank of Arizona in the agreed upon form. Through the negotiation process we have <br />completed a letter of assurance that is more protective of the City than the original draft <br />was. Although, the fundamental nature of a letter of assurance is not like a letter of credit, <br />it is better than the original letter of assurance. The Valley National Bank is making a loan <br />to Louisville Plaza, Inc. to construct the improvements and other site facilities. They also <br />provide personal guarantees, guaranteeing the completion of the subdivision improvements <br />and compliance with the subdivision. The Valley National Bank of Arizona would approve <br />a subdivision agreement and would state that the bank's deed of trust is subordinated to <br />the agreement. This portion would eliminate under foreclosure, the City from loosing its <br />rights under the subdivision agreement. The schedule of approvements totals about <br />$350,000, the letter of assurance would be for the $350,000. We would have $15,000 in <br />cash, personal guarantees from the same individuals who are guaranteeing the loan with <br />the bank. This is the best that can be done without a letter of credit. <br />Howard: In the report that was received from Bondi & Co., their only <br /> concern seemed to be that there may be other outstanding <br /> loans that have priority over the City's. My question is, to your <br /> knowledge is that the case and if it is the case I would like to <br /> know if there is any way that the City can insure we essentially <br /> have first loan rights? <br />Cudlip: I don't quite understand what is being said in the letter. Yes, <br /> we are involved in some other projects. Do they have priority <br /> over your interest, over their interest? It really matters who <br /> requests that cash first. Bondi & Co. took a look at it and <br /> there is sufficient cash available in the different parties. The <br /> City shouldn't be worried. There are no other loans on <br /> Louisville Plaza that are priority to the Valley National Bank <br /> and the City. <br />Howard: I think what they are saying is that there may be loans that the <br /> principals have that may, in fact, have priority to our interest. <br />Cudlip: The parties do have other loans, but there is nothing pending <br /> that would take priority over the City's interest. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.