My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 08 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 1:47:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
8/20/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 08 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Fauson: I agree with that statement. I think that we have to be flexible <br /> in a lot of things that we do and I think the circumstances here <br /> 'are unique. One of our ultimate controls is the seal on the <br /> occupancy permit. I am sure these conditions will be met after <br /> spending thousands and thousands of dollars on a building and <br /> not being able to occupy it. That is one of our assurances. I <br /> would be in favor of accepting this with amendments. <br />Griffiths: If the Council is prepared to do so, its action tonight would be <br /> to approve the concept set out in the amended subdivision <br /> agreement and documents related to the amended subdivision <br /> agreement as described and authorize the Mayor to execute the <br /> amended agreement subject to the completion of the necessary <br /> final reviews by the City Staff and Attorney. Those necessary <br /> final reviews would be of a technical nature to make sure the <br /> words reflected the substance that has been described to you <br /> tonight. <br />Carnival moved to approve the concept set out in the amended subdivision agreement and <br />related documents and authorize the Mayor to execute the amended agreement subject to <br />the completion of necessary final reviews by the City Staff and Attorney, seconded by <br />Howard. Amendment added that the City is not setting a precedence; letters of credit are <br />still required. Roll call was taken on the motion. Motion passed 6-0. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION. USE TAX ISSUE ON BALLOT FOR NOVEMBER 5, 1991, <br />GENERAL ELECTION . FINANCE DEPARTMENT, EXAMPLE OF FINANCIAL <br />PROJECTIONS. CITY ATTORNEY, SAMPLE BALLOT LANGUAGE <br />Brand explained the history of this issue. It has been discussed at previous work sessions <br />and at one meeting. The last time it had been discussed Council had requested to see <br />samples of draft ballot language. Susan Griffiths has provide three possible drafts. Council <br />had also asked for .financial analysis of the difference in the amount of money that the City <br />currently collects through the service expansion fee and how that would compare to use tax <br />if expanded to include residential building materials. Sharon Asti-Caranci, Finance <br />Director, has prepared that analysis. <br />Howard: Mr. Mayor, I believe that I said this at a work session, and I <br /> will repeat myself, my only concern with this issue is confusion <br /> by the voters. It is very, very difficult to bring anything that <br /> says tax to the voters and try to explain away that it is not <br /> really a tax. It's something to balance off action that the <br /> Council has previously taken. The net effect would not <br /> increase the amount of revenue to the City. However, to get <br /> that point across it is very difficult. My personal opinion is <br /> that it would take a fair amount of discussion by the people <br /> and the Council so that information can be given out that this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.