My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 10 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:33 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:01:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
10/1/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 10 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> -- . <br /> Administrator that we are not going to review this level <br /> of detail. <br />Davidson: Mr. Mayor, I have reviewed the study in great detail <br /> and I think it is one of the best ones I have ever seen, <br /> I will have to agree with John that there is not much <br /> need for me to go through a lot of detail. You <br /> mentioned that you were going to send out notifications <br /> to all of the employees of their new classification, would <br /> you be doing that after the budget is approved? I would <br /> hate to send out notices telling everybody you are going <br /> to be in this position and this is the salary range and <br /> have Council take it away from them. If I was an <br /> employee I wouldn't like that. <br />Blankenship: We will definitely wait until we know what dollars are <br /> there before we make a final commitment. <br />Davidson: Is this comprehensive evaluation of the Louisville Public <br /> Safety Department the one the Finance Committee is <br /> going to consider tomorrow? Is that going to address <br /> the questions like retention? <br />Brand: Yes, retention, recruitment, promotion. <br />Howard: If we go on this process, since the budget will be broke, <br /> we are going to have to do some fixing in there. I would <br /> like to see some sort of phased approach to doing this. <br /> We may not be able to it all at once, but I would like to <br /> give staff an opportunity to say this is a way that we can <br /> get to where we need to be in a reasonable time frame. <br /> I think it would be better for staff and it would offer the <br /> Council a reasonable course to go on. <br />Brand: I think we can have those discussions on the 10th and <br /> we will have options for you to chose to bring the <br /> budget into balance. <br />Sackett moved subject to the 1992 Budget review process, that the items listed under <br />agenda item 5G be approved, seconded by Davidson. All in favor. <br />CLAIM FOR COMPENSATORY TIME PAY BY PAM FERRIS DROESCH <br />Annette Brand, City Administrator, gave Council an overview of the compensatory back <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.