Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> -_.. <br />The City of Boulder is interested in providing an alternate site. Louisville City Council <br />authorized Mayor Fauson to contact the Forest Service to see if Louisville would be <br />considered as a possible site. The Forest Service must have a site secured before the end <br />of December to use funds for design and construction. <br />The Forest Service does have money to build, but does not have any money to purchase <br />land. Although, the Forest Service has money to build, land needs to be acquired for them. <br />To be economically feasible, the site needs to be public land which could then be replaced <br />by way of an agreement with Boulder. The Forest Service does have vehicles they would <br />bring with them and have approximately twenty employees. The Forest Service would have <br />a wood working shop that makes the signs for the Mountain Services. The vehicles would <br />not be serviced at this location, they would be serviced by local area dealers, the same with <br />gasoline. Only materials stored on site would be paints used in sign making. <br />John Franklin, III, Director of Community Development, explained to Council some of the <br />issues that were being looked at regarding land. <br />Franklin: There were several objectives and criteria that governed <br /> the search for potential sites during discussion. The key <br /> concern to the Forest Service, who was interested in the <br /> area, was visibility from US 36. Another key criteria was <br /> sufficient acreage. Through the effort of the City of <br /> Boulder, cooperation of Stan Zimmler, Director of <br /> Environmental Service, and others, we determined that <br /> the Forest Service Facility would readily fit on a 4 acre <br /> site of vanous shapes and sizes. The primary <br /> consideration to the City of Louisville and City of <br /> Boulder would be cost; cost of the site; cost of providing <br /> the site. One of our goals was to look at sites that could <br /> be readily converted from unused or presently unused <br /> dedicated land or acquired through potentially new land <br /> dedication with the idea of receiving compensation once <br /> the site was delivered. With that in mind we narrowed <br /> the list of sites down to seven (attachment A). The sites <br /> generally are oriented along US 36. (Franklin did a <br /> video presentation of the proposed seven sites). The <br /> seven sites that were looked at were; A.) 6 acres of City <br /> open space north of Biella property; B.) 23 acres <br /> Richard Biella property; C.) portion of Homart's <br /> Centennial Valley, Parcel L; D.) 1 acre triangle-shaped <br /> open space parcel adjoining McCaslin; E.) 9.7 acres <br /> owned by Robert Brisnehan; F.) 10 acres owned by <br /> Chuck Bellock; G.) 8 acres owned by Thomas Stelmach. <br /> 3 <br />