My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1991 12 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1991 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1991 12 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:34 PM
Creation date
6/16/2006 2:16:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/3/1991
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1991 12 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> .... <br /> matter and be prepared to discuss possible legal <br /> ramifications and impacts if the City Council chooses to <br /> relinquish the easement, or if the City Council chooses <br /> not to. The Council at the last meeting raised the <br /> question as to why relinquish the easement and at the <br /> City Administrator's request, I did prepare a brief <br /> report outlining some of the issues in more detail <br /> (attachment B). The applicants are present and I <br /> believe there are residents from the neighborhood. <br />Tom Johnson, 1121 W. Enclave Circle, Louisville, CO 80027 <br />Johnson: I am speaking on behalf of myself, my wife and our <br /> neighbors, Jim and Grace Hardman. In a letter to John <br /> Franklin, dated September 10, we made the request that <br /> the easement on lots 25 and 26 in the Enclave <br /> development be vacated. This easement, as Mr. <br /> Franklin, has already pointed out, IS a 10 foot <br /> pedestrian easement that exists on the joint property <br /> line of lots 25 and 26. There are several issues that we <br /> feel are important to be cognizant of this issue; first <br /> there is no statement of exactly what the pedestrian <br /> easement entails, what access rights pedestrians are <br /> given by this easement; nor is their any statement as to <br /> who IS responsible for the maintenance of the <br /> pedestrian easement itself; nor is there any mention of <br /> who is responsible for any liability that might be <br /> incurred. These are the issues that lead Jim and myself <br /> and our wives to request that the Council vacate this <br /> easement. As Mr. Franklin already pointed out, fence <br /> permits were obtained in February of 1988 by Mr. <br /> Hardman for his fence at 1119 W. Enclave Circle and <br /> further fence permits were obtained by the James <br /> Construction Company for construction of the fence on <br /> my property at 1121. On advice of counsel, we feel that <br /> this already maintains de facto vacation of the easement <br /> so we are requesting that that be formally announced. <br /> We feel we are in a very exposed situation legally and <br /> want to, as much as possible, minimize our exposure. <br /> We are requesting that this easement be eliminated. <br />Sackett: How did we discover that there was a problem? <br />Johnson: We have known basically since the purchase of the <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.