Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 9, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Hirt summarized the staff presentation from the October meeting, and explained the <br />strategies that were included in the proposed framework. He noted that Baskett and <br />Krantz previously provided written comments on the plan. <br />Baskett said she wanted to recap the high points of the housing needs assessment. She <br />noted its importance in setting the stage for the comprehensive plan. She also noted the <br />findings of the assessment regarding the number of new housing units that would be <br />needed to accommodate the City's projected population growth. <br />Krantz said she appreciated the detail of the report. She noted she had spoken to other <br />residents who questioned whether the projected population growth was inevitable or <br />necessary for the City. She asked Baskett whether she accepted the methodology and <br />growth metrics in the report. <br />Baskett said that she did accept them, but questioned whether the City would need to <br />change its planning policies to accommodate the full population growth projected in the <br />report. <br />Krantz said that she felt the Commission should question the conclusions of the report <br />as they evaluate the proposed strategies. <br />Zuccaro added that the pro-rata share of growth was a factual number from the State. <br />He said that the proposed policies would all still be applicable and useful regardless of <br />any housing unit target the City may set. He noted that State law had recently changed <br />to prohibit population caps and growth limits. He asked the Commission to consider <br />whether these were good policies regardless of the pro-rata share number. <br />Brauneis said that he agreed with Zuccaro. <br />Choi said he also agreed with Zuccaro. He noted that the projections are for the whole <br />County, and that the data is presented to show Louisville working in conjunction with <br />neighboring cities. He would like to be able to focus exclusively on the actions Louisville <br />can take, and not compare it to the other cities. However, he noted that it was important <br />to take this into consideration and said that this should be expanded to include Broomfield. <br />Brauneis said the Commission would have to consider whether the draft strategies would <br />be good approaches for the City. <br />Moline said that he appreciated Choi's comments, and that the lack of affordability in <br />Louisville stood out to him. He was concerned about how the City's character would <br />change if people who worked in Louisville could no longer afford to live there. He said <br />that the report's detailing of the percentage of current residents who could not afford to <br />buy their current properties today was of particular concern. He added that affordability <br />affected every part of the City and was an important issue to address. <br />Brauneis asked whether there were any specific strategies Commissioners wanted to <br />discuss. <br />City of Louisville <br />Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 <br />303.335.4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />