My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 12 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 12 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2023 5:01:52 PM
Creation date
12/20/2023 1:11:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
12/14/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 9, 2023 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />Zuccaro added that market rate housing would have less of a negative impact on the <br />fiscal balance than affordable housing due to the higher amount of property tax and use <br />tax they would generate. High end, luxury housing could be fiscally positive for this <br />reason. <br />Choi concurred with this assessment and added that appropriate residential development <br />was good for commercial development too. This would help to expand the catchment area <br />for local businesses. <br />Brauneis asked Hirt what additional feedback staff were looking for. <br />Hirt said staff were logging all the Commission's comments and would use them to inform <br />the draft of the housing plan. He did not think there were any additional areas the <br />Commissioners had yet to cover. <br />Choi commented that the suggested actions did not always seem to check the boxes of <br />the specific strategies they were attached to. He suggested that each strategy could <br />identify a particular area of the city where they could be implemented to help visualize <br />how they could work. <br />Moline said that he was having difficulty prioritizing the strategies, though many of them <br />did resonate with him. He noted that some of the strategies would be more appropriate in <br />different areas of the city than others. <br />Brauneis again invited public comment. <br />Sherry Sommer, resident, said she appreciated the deliberative tone of the <br />Commission's discussion, and thought that it would be valuable to have listening sessions <br />with the various neighborhoods to gather their input on how these strategies would <br />directly affect them. <br />Howe said that he felt many of the strategies could potentially compromise the nature <br />and character of the city. He thought it would be important for the city to approach <br />population growth with caution, so as not to put too much strain on City resources. None <br />of the strategies singularly stood out to him as a solution. <br />Brauneis said that the strategies were solid enough to move forward with. He noted that <br />they would involve additional outreach in the future, and that this sort of change was not <br />something that could just happen overnight. <br />Moline said that change can be good. He added that the City had changed in many good <br />ways since he moved there 30 years ago, particularly in downtown Louisville. <br />Brauneis concurred and noted that the many empty commercial spaces were distinct <br />from the businesses that gave the City its small town character. <br />Hirt said that Brauneis' comments were valuable for the comprehensive plan, as values <br />were very important to that process. The policies would need to be calibrated to meet the <br />City's values. <br />City of Louisville <br />Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 <br />303.335.4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.