Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 17,2010 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />Russ stated if the HPC wants to clarify this it would require the normal public <br />hearing process in front of both the Planning Commission and the City Council. <br /> <br />Stewart noted the way a street facing fac;ade is addressed is paramount to this <br />conversation. The fac;ades of the buildings in the commercial downtown are far <br />more important to the character of downtown than the parts of the buildings are <br />not visible from the street. <br /> <br />Koertje stated his support for amending the ordina <br />asked if draft language could be presented at th <br />Commission to review. <br /> <br /> <br />ify the language. He <br />for the <br /> <br />Muckle asked if the Planning Staff could get an interpretaf <br />Attorney on how the language should be interpreted. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action - List of C <br /> <br />Stewart added the <br />as contributing a <br />needs to be a p <br />informs owners of <br /> <br />and added perhaps the building surveys done <br />IS. <br /> <br />Muckle not <br />commercial b <br />Normally buildin <br />Also, she noted err <br />difficult to use. <br /> <br />ey is not comprehensive and did not survey all of the <br />e added the issue is also "contributing to what?" <br />tribute to a district, which is not the case in downtown. <br />rs have been found in the surveys and can make them <br /> <br />Russ stated in the short-term the surveys can provide some baseline information. <br /> <br />Koertje asked if this topic could be explored further at the June meeting. <br /> <br />Committee Reports - Design Assistance <br />