My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2024 1:03:35 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 11:13:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2010 07 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21,2010 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Scott Eichorn, applicant, presented his case and asked the Commission if they <br />had any questions. He stated the following regarding the structures integrity: <br />. Recreated the original porch by using historical photos. <br />. House has original stained wood trim. <br />. Windows and doors are in original location. <br /> <br />Muckle asked if Eichorn had the original photos of the porch for the Commission <br />to view. <br /> <br />Eichorn stated the photos were at home. He also stated h <br />porch to the photos as closely as possible. <br /> <br />Eichorn stated he has looked in <br />expensive. <br /> <br /> <br />d of <br /> <br />Muckle asked if the windows were in good shape. <br /> <br />Eichorn answered the windows are aluminum <br />to replace the windows. <br /> <br />Muckle asked Eichorn if he considered <br />replacing. <br /> <br />Eichorn stated the <br />that is the origin <br /> <br />Mu <br /> <br />e stated he was okay with the house being called the <br /> <br />Koertje closed the public hearing <br /> <br />Commission Questions and Comments <br /> <br />Stewart stated he liked the house, believed it retained its architectural integrity <br />and mentioned the outhouse should be land marked as well. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the applicant could always come back to request land marking of <br />outhouse. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.