Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21,2010 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br />Muckle asked if Spears knew anything more about the contractors. <br />Spears said no but added they were very good and very detailed. <br /> <br />Koertje mentioned the application stated she would like to designate the structure <br />and the property. He asked the applicant why she wanted to designate the <br />property. <br /> <br />Spears answered she wanted to protect the property so th <br />anything else on it. <br /> <br />Spears stated she was fine with the name <br /> <br /> <br />Commission Questions and Com <br /> <br />Poppitz stated this was a nice example of a 1950's <br /> <br />Lewis asked Spears what she thought of the n <br /> <br />Public Comments - none heard <br /> <br />Koertje closed the public hearin <br /> <br />Lewis stated her excit <br />house was in really <br /> <br />Koertje agreed <br /> <br />lity of construction was very good. <br /> <br />she could pursue a conservation easement. <br /> <br />lieve there was enough information to landmark the <br /> <br />fine with only land marking the structure. <br /> <br />Lewis made a motion to approve the application based on architectural <br />significance, it represents style and period of mid century architecture. Stewart <br />seconded the motion. Koertje asked if there was any discussion regarding the <br />name of the structure. Lewis suggested to keep the name as is. The motion <br />carried 6 - O. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action - 701 Main Street <br />