My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 10:42:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2009 06 15 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br />Stewart stated that the class seemed interesting but a two day commitment <br />seemed a bit much. <br /> <br />th <br />Lewis asked what dates the class would be available. Koertje answered July 13 <br />th <br />and 14. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action - Programming of Historic Preservation Fund, <br />next steps <br /> <br />Koertje stated that one of the first things we need to do is revisit the application <br />design for the grant program. Meredyth Muth had worked on it at one time so we <br />might be able to use her draft. He then asked the Commission if there should be <br />separate applications for each grant request? <br /> <br />Tofte stated the application process should be as simple as possible. <br /> <br />Muckle agreed with Tofte’s statement. She stated the Boulder County’s <br />application (through Park’s and Open Space) is very simple. <br /> <br />Koertje recommended the Commission create an application that is a hybrid <br />between the Louisville Draft and the Boulder County’s application. Koertje then <br />asked how the loan program should be established? <br /> <br />Lewis asked who would administer the loans? <br /> <br />Muckle asked if there would be a 1099 needed or not? <br /> <br />McCartney stated that staff would follow up on those questions. <br /> <br />Muckle recommended that staff check with other communities on how their loan <br />programs are administered. <br /> <br />McCartney stated that staff would provide example language from other <br />communities as well as a draft application for the next meeting. <br /> <br />Muckle asked about the status on hiring a Preservation Planner? <br /> <br />McCartney stated that they are still in discussions regarding this position and are <br />hoping to have someone by the Fall. <br /> <br />Plan for Structural Surveying <br /> <br />Koertje asked if the Commission was still interested in providing a building survey <br />even though the State Historical Fund (SHF) just denied the grant application for <br />the survey. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.