My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 08 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2010 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 08 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:01 PM
Creation date
7/30/2010 1:21:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/3/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C2
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2010 08 03
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 20, 2010 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella stated her understanding the projection only extends to the <br />first year. She asked if there is a problem with the use tax projection being too high. <br />City Manager Fleming suggested the public might perceive a problem ifthe projection is <br />too high. Finance Director Watson explained the City wants the estimate to be high <br />enough so it is not necessary to refund revenues that could be higher than anticipated. <br />Councilor Muckle inquired about the results of the phone surveyand the number of <br />emails received from the residents. City Manager Fleming statedapproximately 20 <br />emails have been received to date, with roughly 2/3 in favor and 1/3 in opposition. With <br />respect to the phone survey the results were split evenly. <br />Mayor Sisk stated a number of people have said in this economic situation, they do not <br />need any new taxes. He felt the public has a right to vote on the issue and he favored <br />referringthe measure to the voters. He voiced his belief the Council must decide how <br />the funds would be spent, should the measure pass. He stressed the importance of <br />adequately funding projects and creating a “Rainy Day Fund.” Henotedthe ordinance <br />was amended to include a use tax on rental units. He thanked City Manager Fleming <br />for his work on the issue. <br />Councilor Sackett hadconversations with citizens relative to the use taxand some were <br />supportive and some not.He felt the citizens have a right to vote on the measure. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella heard from residentswho support a use taxbecause it may <br />reinstate Cityservices and events, which make Louisville special. She noted the City <br />must diversify their revenue stream. <br />Councilor Muckle emphasized the results of the surveyand stated it is a timely issue <br />when a number of large developments will be coming to the City. <br />Councilor Dalton stated many residents support the use tax, many not. Small <br />businesses have told him they oppose a use tax. Manycitizens would like to see the <br />City events reinstated. He is not convinced a new tax is necessary, but he supports <br />putting the measure on the ballotso the voters can decide. <br />MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Marsella moved to approve Ordinance No. 1575, Series <br />2010 with second reading amendments, seconded by CouncilorYarnell.Roll call vote <br />was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. <br />RESOLUTION NO.41,SERIES 2010 - A RESOLUTION CALLING A SPECIAL <br />ELECTION FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2010, TO BE CONDUCTED AS A COORDINATED <br />ELECTION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING A TABOR BALLOT ISSUE TO <br />THE REGISTERED ELECTORS OF THE CITY <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.