Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Heather A. Balser, Deputy City Manager <br />June 28, 2010 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Issue committees are required to be registered with the Colorado Secretary of State and <br />follow other rules, a discussion of which is beyond the scope of this memo. <br /> <br />Appointed officials such as board and commission members may: <br /> <br />. Expend personal funds and use personal time for electioneering, subject to applicable <br />campaign laws. <br />. Express a personal opinion on ballot issues, so long as not expending public money from <br />any source to do so. <br /> <br />Individual employees may: <br /> <br />. Respond to unsolicited questions about ballot issues. <br />. Expend personal funds and use personal time for electioneering, subject to applicable <br />campaign laws. Such activities should not be conducted during the employee's working <br />time or in the offices of the City. Employees cannot give the impression, however, that <br />the issue is endorsed by the City. <br /> <br />II. ENFORCEMENTIPENALTIES <br /> <br />The Secretary of State has jurisdiction over a complaint of an FCP A violation. A complaint may be <br />filed by any person who believes that a violation has occurred, and a hearing before an <br />administrative law judge (ALl) is held. Any violation of C.R.S. 9 1-45-117 is "subject to the <br />provisions of sections 9(2) and 1 O( 1)6 of article XXVIII of the state constitution or any appropriate <br />order or relief, including an order directing the person making a contribution or expenditure in <br />violation of this section to reimburse the fund of the state or political subdivision, as applicable, <br />from which such moneys were diverted for the amount of the contribution or expenditure, injunctive <br />relief, or a restraining order to enjoin the continuance of the violation." CRS 9 1-45- <br />117(1 )(b )(III)( 4). <br /> <br />III. ADDITIONAL LIMITATIONS TO CONSIDER <br /> <br />Beyond the scope of the FCP A, courts have long recognized that there are constitutional restrictions <br />on the use of public funds for campaign purposes. One judge observed, in connection with a <br />Colorado public entity's campaign expenditures on a proposed constitutional amendment, that: <br /> <br />[E]very court which has addressed the issue to date has found the use of public funds <br />for partisan campaign purposes improper, either on the ground that such use was not <br />explicitly authorized. . . or on the broader ground that such expenditures are never <br />appropriate. . . . A fundamental precept of this nation's democratic electoral process <br />is that the government may not "take sides" in election contests or bestow an unfair <br />advantage on one of several competing factions. <br /> <br />6 Pursuanl to Article XXV III * 10(1), "any person who violates any provision of this article relating to contribution or voluntary <br />spending limits shall be subject to a civil penalty of at least double and up to five times the amount contributed, received, or spent...." <br />