My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 07 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 9:21:22 AM
Creation date
8/5/2010 12:16:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 07 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 2010 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />Awning Signs: <br />Russ led the discussion. <br />Russell: Technical definition — is it for a functioning awning. <br />Russ: No. Baldwin Park has a definition that does not permit closed ended <br />awnings. <br />Loo: Not worried about closed awnings, but don't like awnings on Front Street. <br />They should not be permitted in combination with wall signs. <br />Russell: There should be a definition that gives a function to the awning. <br />Menaker: Maybe have the awning square foot area subtracted from wall sign <br />area, but allow both. Maybe projection signs should not be permitted. <br />Lipton: Bring back more awning discussion and ir1formation ext meeting. <br />Windows / Sandwich Boards / Menu Boxes: ► <br />Russ: Sandwich boards should be regulrther. <br />Loo: Do most merchants remove them at of business? <br />Russ: Yes, I think most do bring t em back in. <br />Russell: They are appropriate. <br />Sheets: Menu boxes should be en <br />Murals: <br />Russ: Not allowed i <br />limited to side no <br />Loo: Too scary / <br />Lipton: Co ttract a nuisance/ tagging. <br />Russ isa ould we establish a Public Art Commission? <br />Russ: We could limit istorical features only. <br />Loo: Could it be permit as an SRU? <br />Sheets: I think they wo e nice — maybe as an SRU. <br />Lipton: Hard to contr C should be the review board. <br />Russell: Request Cit Attorney insight. <br />Pritchard: Not support. Creating problems down the road. <br />Menaker: Keep the Coke sign at the museum. <br />Kiosks: <br />Russ: Should be permitted through SRU. <br />Landmark Signs: <br />Russ: Allow non -conforming signs to come back if destroyed. <br />Follow Boulders guidelines. <br />Bouldlic art only/ no trademark or logo/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.