My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2024 12:46:13 PM
Creation date
8/20/2010 9:41:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2010 08 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 19, 2010 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Stewart agreed and added the existing carport does not detract from the <br />architectural integrity. He stated the carport could even be removed at a later <br />date and not affect the house. <br />Muckle recommended the house be named Connaroe House, since there <br />already are other structures name Jacoe. <br />McCartney recommended the house could be named "Jacoe Connaroe House <br />Lewis stated liked the idea of having a dual name (Jacoe Connaroe House). She <br />also agreed with the fact the house was strong in social and architectural <br />integrity. <br />Williams agreed with the other Commissioners statements. <br />Koertje agreed as well. <br />Lewis made a motion to approve the application base on architectf and <br />social significance, it represents style and period of x 2 architecture '8 he also <br />stated the name should be "Jacoe Connaroe Ho Stewart seconded the <br />motion. The motion carried 5 <br />Update /Discussion /Action Preervir <br />McCartney presented the attached memo. <br />Koertje opened discussions regarding the recommendations for the 2011 <br />Preservation Awards. <br />After much deliberation over which structure to nominate, the Commission <br />:x x <br />establish o following list: <br />eservationx ward 1024 Grant Avenue <br />sitive Addition 1008 Jefferson Avenue <br />Ada BW Re -use 921 Main Street <br />Ink <br />Historic Featurp Silo (Pine Street) <br />Update /Discussion /Action Possible Commercial Incentives <br />Continue to August 16, 2010 meeting. Poppitz was not at meeting to discuss this <br />item. Koertje recommended staff provide information regarding existing <br />Business Improvement Program (BAP), as an example of commercial incentives. <br />Update /Discussion /Action Walls Vs. Windows <br />McCartney presented the attached memo. McCartney stated the Planning <br />Director, Troy Russ, had asked to continue this item until August 16, 2010, but <br />McCartney wanted feedback regarding the proposed redlines. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.