My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2024 12:46:13 PM
Creation date
8/20/2010 9:41:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2010 08 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lewis recommended <br />added Fossil shoul <br />throughout eith <br />The Commission <br />Cemetery landmark application. <br />Update on Demoliti rr Request None heard <br />Items from Commission Members None heard <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 19, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />Muckle stated she thought the existing illustration, shown in section b, should be <br />changed to represent the proposed redlines. <br />Stewart and Lewis provided a sketch to McCartney and recommended staff <br />include a similar sketch in the proposed redlines. McCartney agreed. <br />The HPC asked McCartney to bring the proposed diagrams back to the August <br />meeting. <br />Update /Discussion /Action Plaques <br />McCartney presented the attached memo and discuss g x l e attached invoices. <br />Koertje recommended Fossil to do the entire prof <br />The Commission stated they would rather hgxronze. <br />McCartney stated the bidding companies °xxxxxxxxxre having problems with the <br />proposed design. <br />Muckle asked why they were having issues. <br />McCartney stated it was due to the x xf liefxfnents. <br />ey have Eriandmark bid on the entire sign. She <br />II and x °xx ntire sign should have one material <br />all laminate. <br />back new bid. <br />Update <br />McC n y state dh wou ng the application to the next meeting. <br />Comifee Reports <br />Muckle -d she is still working with Tim Domenico and the mine his family <br />owned in Lyille. <br />Discussion Items for Next Meeting, August 16, 2010 <br />Plaque Prices /Bids Update <br />Language to amend the preservation ordinance to clarify the walls vs. <br />windows discussion New diagram <br />Commercial Incentives <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.