Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 21, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br /> <br />Williams questioned if there were any allowances for alley signs. <br />Russ answered maybe blade signs but no wall signs. <br />Poppitz recommended the allowance of alleys signs. <br />Williams asked if there would be a maximum number of wall signs permitted, say <br />for buildings with multiple tenants. <br />McMillan answered a building could have as many wall signs as the area <br />permits. <br />Muckle stated there should be incentives established if the historical sign is <br />retained. <br />Stewart recommended there should be a waiver permitted to allow for a larger <br />sign if the historic building is preserved. <br />Projecting Sign discussion – no comments <br />Marquee Sign discussion <br />Lewis asked if staff had considered making a consistent maximum height for <br />every sign type. <br />McMillan stated staff would create a supplemental drawing to show how the <br />maximum heights vary. <br />Freestanding Sign discussion – no comments <br />Awning Sign Discussion <br />Koertje reminded staff that awnings should not obscure the architectural; integrity <br />of the building. <br />Lewis recommended a maintenance provision to make sure tattered awnings <br />would be repaired. <br />Window/Sandwich Board/Menu Box Sign discussion – no comment <br />Kiosk Sign discussion <br />Commissioners worried the kiosks would look sloppy, like the kiosk in Pearl <br />Street Mall (Boulder). <br />Landmark Sign discussion <br />Muckle stated the process for landmarking a sign should be as easy as possible. <br />She also stated incentives should be provided if they landmark the historic sign. <br /> <br />