My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 02 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2024 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 02 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2024 6:10:12 PM
Creation date
2/29/2024 11:25:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/8/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 14, 2023 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />Krantz asked about whether this would apply to Old Town given the lot sizes. <br />Hirt said that the old rules were limited to newer areas like the McCaslin corridor and <br />noted that the details of where it would and would not apply were included in the staff <br />report. He added that Old Town would be eligible for expedited PUDs under the proposal. <br />Howe asked whether there was any way an expedited PUD could go straight to City <br />Council. <br />Hirt said no, it would still have to go to the Planning Commission first. <br />Public Comments: <br />Sherry Sommer, resident, said that the proposal made sense as it would remove some <br />unreasonable hurdles. She appreciated that it would only apply to lots smaller than 7 <br />acres. <br />Commissioner Discussion: <br />Choi said that he liked the requirements staff was keeping and appreciated the <br />elimination of undue burden. He was in support. <br />Krantz said that she was in support. <br />Osterman said that she was in support. <br />Howe said that he was in support. He noted that PUDs had a lifespan of 3 years before <br />they were required to be renewed. He thought that this should help act as an incentive to <br />developers to complete their projects within a reasonable time frame. <br />Baskett said that she was in support. <br />Brauneis said that he was in support, and that he hoped it would make things less <br />cumbersome with no loss of oversight by the City. <br />Motion to approve Resolution 20, Series 2023 was moved by Krantz and seconded <br />Osterman. The motion was adopted by a vote of 6 to 0. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Howe gave thanks to staff, to his fellow Commissioners, and to the citizens of Louisville. <br />Krantz thanked staff and everyone for their help and wished the rest of the Commission <br />the best of luck moving forward. <br />Osterman bid farewell to the Commission and said thanks for the opportunity to serve. <br />Brauneis thanked the Commissioners for their hard work and service. <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />Zuccaro echoed Brauneis' words of thanks for the hard work of the Commissioners. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Motion to adjourn was moved by Krantz, seconded by Osterman, and adopted by voice <br />vote. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.