Laserfiche WebLink
City' L. Lollis}lVille <br />COLORADO-SINCE 187t+ <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Community Development <br />ITEM 2 <br />749 Main Street # Louisville CO 80027 , 303.335.4592 * www. louis villeco. gov <br />CITY COUNCIL FINANCE COMMITTEE <br />ROB ZUCCARO, AICP, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT <br />DIRECTOR <br />FEBRUARY 22, 2024 <br />FISCAL IMPACT MODEL OVERVIEW <br />SUMMARY: <br />Staff is presenting an overview of the City's Fiscal Impact Model for discussion and <br />questions. Staff will also provide a demonstration of the model at this meeting. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Fiscal impact analysis is a tool that a city may use to estimate revenues and costs <br />that may result from new development or land uses changes. Different land uses, <br />such as industrial, cffice, retail, and residential land uses, will have different <br />impacts on city revenue and costs to provide services and infrastructure to those <br />uses. Each land use scenario has different tax and fee structures and demands <br />on city services. The fiscal impact analysis estimates city revenues from one-time <br />fees such as permitting and development impact fees, and ongoing tax revenues <br />anticipated from the development. The analysis compares those revenues to the <br />estimated costs to the city to provide and expand services and public infrastructure <br />when necessary, and provides the net result. <br />It is important to recognize that a fiscal model does not reflect market conditions <br />that may or may not be present to support certain land use scenarios. For <br />example, a city may want to promote commercial development for tax revenue <br />purposes. A fiscal analysis of a primarily commercial development will show a net <br />positive fiscal benefit to the city. However, if market conditions do not support <br />commercial development in the location planned, such commercial development <br />will likely not take place. If a city is promoting new development or redevelopment <br />in these areas to achieve other city policies or goals, market feasibility should be <br />a consideration in addition to fiscal analysis. <br />In addition, promoting non-commercial development can provide secondary <br />positive fiscal impacts to the city not captured in a fiscal analysis model. Such <br />development may provide support to other existing sales tax generating <br />developments or create demand for new sales tax generating development. There <br />can also be positive impact from "place making" and creating vibrant places that <br />attract people to an area that fosters market demand but may not be viewed <br />positively in a fiscal analysis - <br />While positive fiscal balance overall for the city is desired and necessary for a <br />balanced budget, other policies goals related to affordable housing, economic <br />vitality, equity, diversity, and inclusion, desired community character, and <br />6/ 132 <br />