Laserfiche WebLink
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 16, 2023 <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />the sidings and windows. She asked whether the Commission would prefer windows that <br />reflected the style of when the sidings were installed. <br />Beauchamp asked whether the Commission needed to consider all the factors to <br />approve the landmarking. <br />Haley said that no, each part was separate. <br />Brackett Hogstad said that the Commission needed to think about landmarking the <br />property as it was, and not as it would be if the other grants were approved. She said that <br />the Commission could consider the discontinuity in historical styles after discussing the <br />landmarking. <br />Haley said that the Commission should first address the landmarking, then address the <br />alteration certificate. She added that the applicant could then decide not to proceed if they <br />disagreed with the Commission. <br />Dalia asked whether the applicant could still change the windows if the landmarking was <br />approved but the grant was not. <br />Brackett Hogstad said no, but noted that it would not be final until it was approved by <br />Council. <br />Anderson reiterated his concerns about the styling of the windows. <br />Haley asked for the other Commissioner's thoughts on the landmarking proposal. <br />Burg thought that the application met the criteria given that it had retained its initial <br />design. It had a strong social history, and met the landmarking criteria. <br />Dunlap said that the Commission had landmarked structures less accurate to their <br />original designs than this previously. He asked whether the Commission could request <br />that the applicant change the windows to be more like the original design. <br />Keller said that he did not have an issue with the change in windows, and noted that they <br />could be rehabilitated or restored at a later date. He said that the single pane windows <br />could be replaced with more energy efficient ones through restoration. He felt that the <br />historical and social significance was important, and would therefore like to see it <br />landmarked. <br />Dalia said that he was in support of landmarking. <br />Motion to approve the landmarking was moved by Burg and seconded by Keller. The <br />motion was adopted by a vote of 7 to 0. <br />The Commissioners moved on to the Alteration Certificate and Grant Request. <br />Burg asked whether the owner could request an alteration certificate in the future for the <br />sidings after the landmarking was approved. <br />Haley said that they could. <br />Beauchamp said that he liked Anderson's idea of recommending that the applicant <br />restore the original design of the windows. <br />Dalia said that he was supportive of just changing the proportions of the front facade, not <br />all of the windows on the property. <br />Haley asked to see the grant request again. <br />Brackett Hogstad said that the request was for the windows and the front porch. <br />Burg noted that the grant request was under the maximum, so the applicant had some <br />wiggle room. <br />