Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />Public Comments;, <br />There were none. <br />Commission Ouestions: <br />Commission Litpon: <br />Q. Has there been any decision with regard to the realignment of 88th street? <br />A. Orr: My understanding is that the 88th street realignment occurs at the intersection of <br />Dillon Road. This package offers a dedication of a 60 foot right-of-way along 88th that <br />would allow for that, which would ultimately be up to the City. <br />Q. Has there been any thought with regard to the commercial parcels? <br />A. The uses which are outlined in the design guidelines are what you could envision there. <br />We have not tried to marked the property yet. <br />Q. So the intent is to sell it for a totally unrelated use, but compatible to the development of <br />the overall site. <br />A. Correct. <br />Commission McAvinew: <br />Q. Is it correct that the City wants to keep 88th to a two lane road because of the bridge <br />limitation? <br />A. Orr: I don't believe that it was necessarily tied to the bridge restriction. The bridge, at <br />some point in the future, will probably be replaced. <br />Commissioner Boulet: <br />Q. Is the attachment of the design development standards to the Intergovernmental <br />Agreement the exact version or is there a later one? <br />A. Paul Wood: The version dated June 7th is the latest version. <br />Q. There is some mention of retail use, please explain. <br />A. Orr: Retail is precluded and would not be allowed. <br />Q. Will the internal inconsistency's in these documents be addressed? <br />A. That was attached at the City's request and was never intended to be part of the <br />Intergovernmental agreement. <br />Commission VanNostrand: <br />Q. Has there been any thought to pedestrian and bicycle access? <br />A. Our intent is to invite the community to use the facilities. The access will be sized to <br />accommodate both pedestrian and bicycles. <br />3 <br />