Planning Commission Minutes 2006 02 23

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes FEBRUARY 23, 2006 Page 2 of 7 Conflict ofInterest and Disclosure: None heard. Lipton discussed the format that the meeting will follow for the evening as: public comment, staff report, questions of staff, applicant presentation, questions of applicant, public comment, commission discussion and commission direction to staff and applicant. Public Comment: Michael Levy, Portside Ct., Lafayette discussed his concerns regarding density, location of and lack of buffer zones. Jennifer Bales, 1520 Euclid Cr, Lafayette discussed the pump house location and its relationship to the proposed development, the height of proposed townhouses, location of townhouses appears to be at the highest point on the property, and proposed density for the entire site. Betty (unknown), 709 Paschal Dr, Lafayette, discussed density, traffic concerns, and other possible locations for higher density. Bill Rumble, 744 Paschal Dr., Lafayette, discussed density, parks and playgrounds for the development, and the possible effect on city services. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Wood distributed a packet of correspondences received that included eighteen (18) emails representing seventeen (17) property owners. He requested that those items be entered into the public record. Pritchard moved and Dalton seconded a motion to enter the packet of correspondence into the public record. Motion passed by voice vote. Wood provided the following summary points: . Reviewed the applicants name and who represent as follows: North End Properties, LLC - represented by Michael Markel and Chad Kipfer of Markel Homes, Brian Rick of Brian Rick and Associates, Scott Pessin ofDTJ Design, and Jim Blankenship of JLB Engineering Consultants. . Property is currently zoned Planned Community Zoned district - Commercial and Residential (PCZD-C-R). . The subject parcel is located in the northeast corner of Louisville, is 73 acres in size with frontage on both South Boulder Road as well as Paschal Drive. . Reviewed a density comparison chart on page 5 of the February 23,2006 Staff Report and noted the differences between the entitled density and the requested densities. . Reviewed the following areas of the application regarding compliance with the Comprehensive Plan: Framework Plan Map; Land Use; Principles and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan; Transportation; Fiscal Health; Housing; Parks, Recreation, Trail and Open Space; and Urban Design. . Review of the Preliminary Subdivision Plat included the follow areas of discussion: Public-Use Dedication; Hecla Lake Dedication; Davidson and Goodhue Ditch Laterals; Park and Trail Dedication; Northern Colorado Water Conservation District; and Public Street Standards. . Review of the Preliminary PUD Development Plan. Wood reviewed the requested information that the Planning Commission had requested during the February 9, 2006 meeting: