My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2006 03 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2006 Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2006 03 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:16 AM
Creation date
10/19/2006 3:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2006 03 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />MARCH 9, 2006 <br />Page 11 of 16 <br /> <br />. Confusing <br />. Number of tenants should be limited <br />. Logos should be used on the building and not in the monument sign. <br />She continued with a discussion of the illumination of the 2nd floor signs stating that she supports <br />it. She stated she would also support a continuance. <br /> <br />Dalton stated that the corporate logo should be seen from the road even when placed on the wall <br />of the building, supports the 2nd floor signs and to continue the application. <br /> <br />Hartman stated that logos are important and should be permitted, the size of the monument <br />appears to be too large and there should be no telephone numbers on the sign. <br /> <br />Pritchard inquired if anyone knew the height of the monument sign at Safeway. He stated that he <br />thought it was 10ft. He stated that if the application is continued then the Commission needs to <br />be specific as to what the applicant is to bring back. <br /> <br />Commissioners discussed continuance and what they would request of the applicant when he <br />brings the application back to the Commission. Lipton summarized the discussion with the <br />following list of items for the applicant to address for the Commission review: <br />. Uniformity - size for each tenant panel with 7" letter height <br />. Examples of other heights <br />. Background Color, opaque panels, with consistent letter and font style <br />. Use of corporate logos <br /> <br />Loo moved and Dalton seconded a motion to continue Resolution No.8, Series 2006 to the April <br />13, 2006 Planning Commission public hearing. Motion passed by voice vote. <br /> <br />Lipton declared a five minute break at 8:30 PM <br /> <br />'" Resolution No. 09, Series 2006, Lowe's Home Improvement; An application to amend <br /> <br />the final planned unit development (PUD) plan to add a 24 to 32-foot wide and 450-foot <br /> <br />long drive aisle on the west side of the existing building. The proposed site plan <br /> <br />modifications would also require modifications to site grading, drainage and landscaping. <br /> <br />1171 Dillon Road; Lot 5, Centennial Valley, Parcel L, Filing No.1. Case #06-003-FP. <br /> <br />. Applicant and Representative: APD Engineering, Chris Kambar <br />. Owner: Lowe's HIW, Inc, Derek Kilby <br />. Case Manager: Kenneth Johnstone, Principal Planner <br /> <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Daily Camera on February 19, 2006. Posted in City Hall, the Louisville Public <br />Library, the Recreation Center and the Courts and Police Department Building and mailed to the <br />surrounding property owners on February 17, 2006. <br /> <br />Conflict ofInterest and Disclosure: None. <br /> <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Johnstone presented the following summary: <br />. Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse is requesting to amend a final planned unit <br />development (PUD) plan to add a service drive aisle on the west side of the existing <br />building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.