My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2006 03 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2006 Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2006 03 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:16 AM
Creation date
10/19/2006 3:19:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2006 03 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />MARCH 9, 2006 <br />Page 14 of 16 <br /> <br />Johnstone stated that the CSSDG requires a 6' height but the recommended 8' would give an <br />additional 2 feet of screening of the loading dock door. <br /> <br />Loo discussed what the difference would be to the site for the two drive aisle widths, 15 feet vs. <br />23 feet. <br /> <br />Johnstone stated that the 15' width would allow more landscape coverage and has the potential <br />of not allowing the staging of delivery semi-trailer trucks. <br /> <br />Loo asked if the building was sprinkled. <br /> <br />Kambar and Johnstone stated that they do not know. <br /> <br />Lipton asked if there were other areas on the site that could be considered for loading. <br /> <br />Kambar stated that he was not aware of other potential loading areas. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: None <br /> <br />Commission Questions of Staff and Applicant: None <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Comments: <br />Hartman had no comments. <br /> <br />Dalton supports a combination wall and landscape plan. <br /> <br />Loo supports the staff with the recommendation of the wall and additional landscaping. <br /> <br />Lipton supports the staff recommendation of the wall and landscaping. <br /> <br />Pritchard supports a continuance to allow staff and applicant to work on the details of the wall <br />and landscaping. <br /> <br />Deborski supports a continuance and requested that the store manager be available at the next <br />meeting to answer Commission questions. <br /> <br />Sheets supports the continuance and the request to have the store manager present at the next <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Sheets moved and Loo seconded a motion to continue Resolution No.9, Series 2006 to the April <br />13, 2006 Planning Commission public hearing. Motion passed by voice vote. <br /> <br />Lipton requested that Kambar communicate to the store manager their desire to have him present <br />at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Lipton discussed the agenda items set for the March 16, 2006 overflow meeting as follows: <br />. Sign Code <br />. Coal Creek Cemetery <br />. North End, continuance request. <br /> <br />Lipton reviewed the agenda items tentatively scheduled for April 13, 2006 at 6:30 PM as <br />follows: <br />'" Resolution No. 06, Series 2006, North End Properties, LLC; A request to amend the <br />North Louisville and Schempp General Development Plans (GDPs) for the subject <br />property to provide for a mixed use development including commercial along South <br />Boulder Road and a variety of housing products on the remainder of the property. The <br />request also includes a preliminary subdivision plat and a preliminary planned unit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.