My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 09 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 09 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:11 AM
Creation date
9/29/2010 1:36:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 09 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 19, 2010 <br />Page 10 of 17 <br />McCartney continued with a review of the five SRU criteria in the LMC Section <br />17.40.100.A. He stated all the criteria have been met. <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 16, Series 2010 with the following <br />conditions: <br />1) The LMC parking ratio of 1 parking space per 3 seats (members) shall <br />apply for this use. <br />2) The applicant shall revise the SRU when membership exceeds 80 <br />members. Amend the SRU plan to remove any narrative regarding <br />expansion above 80 members. <br />3) SRU is for this applicant only. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Loo asked if the use meets code for `assembly'. <br />McCartney stated the plan had been reviewe• ® he Fire Di and they had <br />no comments. <br />Russell requested clarification for the p. • calcula <br />McCartney stated staff had reviewed the pa • r- • ement with both square <br />footage and seating capacity. <br />Pritchard asked if they would ha <br />McCartney stated all signs would <br />Applicant Presentatio <br />Scott Kelly, pastor <br />questions. <br />Lipton asked how <br />Kelly rep :N®� aver <br />servic <br />Br <br />when <br />McCartn <br />community. <br />Members of th <br />None heard. <br />plication and asked for Commission <br />has on a regular basis. <br />5/30 0 • y and they had 50 for their Christmas <br />the parking could be monitored and enforced <br />reases to 80. <br />ng concerns will be based on complaints from the <br />Staff and Applicant Summary and Recommendation: <br />No additional comments from either staff or the applicant. <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Russell, Brauneis, Sheets, O'Connell, Loo, Pritchard and Lipton stated their <br />support for the SRU request. <br />Sheets moved and Brauneis seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 18, <br />Series 2010 as presented by staff with the three conditions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.