Planning Commission Minutes 2006 05 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes May 11 , 2006 Page 9 of 12 Pritchard expressed concerns with granting the requested number of reliefs. He supports the additional time of staff and the City's attorney to develop the necessary agreement for the temporary use of the property. Loo questioned if the Commission would be willing to support other temporary uses in this area as well other areas that are undeveloped in Louisville. Pritchard stated that the temporary use is appropriate in this area since redevelopment had not begun. Lipton expressed concern with the 5-year term, a 6-foot screening for existing residential neighbors is not enough and the current condition of Cannon Street and not wanting to put demands of the City for street improvements to Cannon Street just for this particular use. He requested that language regarding those improvements be a part of the agreement. Lipton requested final comments and summary from each Commissioner. McAvinew now supports the project but would request additional fence requirements along the residential sections of the property and the length of the term of the agreement should be shortened with renewals. Pritchard requested a shorter term for the agreement, a renewable clause and wording to protect the Applicant from premature street improvements. Hartman supports the shorter term of the agreement. Dalton suggested that the term be for three-years with a 2-year renewable term that is easy for all parties, perhaps an Administrative Approval for the City's interest. Lipton summarized with the following points for staff to use for the development of the agreement and the continuation of the application: . Three-year original term length . Multiple two-year administrative approval renewal . No demands of the City for street improvements just for this project. . Privacy fencing adjacent to the residential areas to be reviewed by the Commission. . The inclusion of the original three conditions. Planning Commission agreed those were the points of discussion and direction for the staff and the applicant. Lipton moved and Pritchard seconded a motion directing the staff to work with the City Attorney and the applicant to develop the agreement and to come back to the Commission when those items are completed. Motion passed by voice vote. ~ Resolution No. 20, Series 2006, Amendment to HWY 42 Revitalization Area Comprehensive Plan - proposed amendment regarding transportation and access plan - public hearing. . Applicant: City of Louisville Planning Division . Case Manager: Paul Wood, Planning Director Public Notice Certification: