Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />MAY 25 2006 <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />2. The applicant shall provide additional requested legal and geotechnical documentation <br />related to the use of Hecla Lake and the associated dam structure. Further documentation <br />is required related to the water resource required, a hazard designation to be assigned, and <br />an evaluation of the grading plan. <br />3. Applicant shall provide additional documentation confirming that proposed <br />unencumbered public-use land dedication will be conveyed free and clear of all <br />encumbrances. <br />4. The applicant shall secure written authorization from the Goodhue and Davidson Ditch <br />Companies regarding the plating and conveyance of the required ditch easements. <br />S. The applicant shall secure an executed use agreement from the Davidson Highline Lateral <br />Ditch Company authorizing shared use of the ditch corridor with a trail. <br />6. Public facilities related to sanitary waste collection and storm drainage shall be subject to <br />further review by the City as to whether such facilities will have sufficient capacity to <br />serve the development. <br />7. Applicant shall provide written approval of an access plan by the Northern Colorado <br />Water Conservation District (NCWCD) to its pump station facility. <br />8. The applicant shall coordinate with the NCWCD to provide for independent testing of <br />noise levels adjacent to the existing pump station. <br />9. The applicant shall revise the preliminary subdivision plat and PUD to reflect the size, <br />design criteria, ownership and maintenance responsibility of the passive parks and play <br />fields as coordinated with and approved by the Department of Land Management. <br />10. The applicant shall coordinate with staff to determine a phasing plan for the dedication <br />and development of the physical trail infrastructure. <br />11. All yard, bulk and other urban design components of the project shall be subject to <br />further City review and approval as part of any final plat and PUD application. <br />12. The preliminary subdivision plat, PUD development plan, and GDP shall be modified for <br />the area of single-family units on the easternmost portion of the project, the minimum lot <br />size is no smaller than the average lot size of the adjacent neighbors. <br />13. The preliminary subdivision plat, PUD development plan, and GDP shall be modified so <br />that, for the area of single-family units on the north side (along Paschal), the lots are no <br />smaller than IS,OOO SF. <br />14. The preliminary subdivision plat, PUD development plan, and GDP shall be modified to <br />increase the proposed commercial square footage by SO%. The additional square footage <br />shall be located in P A #2, immediately north of P A # 1 and on either side of the proposed <br />round-a-bout in lieu of the multi-family parcels. <br />IS. The preliminary subdivision plat, PUD development plan, and GDP shall be redesigned <br />to reflect a maximum total of3S0 residential units. <br />16. The City Council should consider how this development can support the City's affordable <br />housing policy objectives. <br /> <br />Discussion of the motion followed with these topics: affordable housing, number of units, trail <br />connectivity and what the next review process involves for the Commission and City Council. <br /> <br />Loo moved and McAvinew seconded a substitute motion that would set the number of housing <br />units at 37S. <br /> <br />Discussion of the substitute motion followed on these topics: number of units and the additional <br />commercial/retail square footage. <br />