City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 10 05

Home Browse Search

e) That all jurisdiction having land use control powers in this watershed continue to participate in FEMA's flood insurance Community Rating System and public education programs. 2. List on each plan view and profile sheet of the conceptual design, where appropriate, the recommended wetland mitigations that will be needed to implement recommended improvements, if any. 3. Show on appropriate plan and profile sheets (and as deemed necessary) facilities to arrest the vertical degradation of the low -flow channel of natural and man -made waterways and to help rehabilitate, as much as possible their stable function and habitat. 4. Recommend rehabilitating eroded and degraded banks where needed and desired to arrest the horizontal erosion along natural waterways using bio- engineered methods that combine buried soil riprap and revegetation with native species of riparian and dryland vegetation. 5. Show on plan view and profile sheets the needed buttressing of critical utilities and other structures that may be endangered by stream erosion. 6. Using the input from stakeholders and the public, work with Sponsors and affected other local jurisdictions to prioritize the recommended facilities and actions that are listed in the Final Report and clearly articulate them in that document. 7. Describe the recommended type and schedule of maintenance activities for all improved facilities recommended in the Final Report. 8. Consider the various functions of all natural waterways in the study watersheds and their floodplain, including flood conveyance, riparian habitat, open space, aesthetics, recreation, urban development, water quality, utility crossing, transportation and other features. 9. Acknowledge in the Final Report, that land -use changes to the contributing watersheds affect the flood hazard nature (i.e., runoff rates, volumes and depths), the transport of sediment, and the water quality of the receiving natural waterways. The Final Report, under "General Recommendations" shall suggest that Sponsors and any other jurisdiction having land use control powers in these watersheds monitor land -use changes and whenever the land -use changes result in imperviousness ratios that exceed the projections identified in the Final Report, these jurisdiction take steps to further limit increases in stormwater runoff through the use of additional on -site detention, infiltrating BMPs and WQCV BMPs, thereby reducing the runoff rates, volumes and future damage potentials to the Final Report levels. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Include an Executive Summary in the Final Report written in plain, non - technical language, which is directed primarily at the general public and elected officials. This summary should, at the minimum, contain the following as well as other items listed in District's checklist for preparation of the final outfall systems conceptual design report: 1. A brief summary of the planning process including numbers of progress and public meetings. 2. A brief description of the decisions made by project sponsors during this project. 3. A brief summary of all design criteria specifically developed for this plan. 4. A brief summary of the following sections of the Final Report: Purpose and Scope, Study Area Selected Plan: Lafayette - Louisville Boundary OSP 3 42