My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 10 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2010 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2010 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:05:02 PM
Creation date
11/10/2010 10:35:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/19/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
6C3
Record Series Code
45.010
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2010 10 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
National Register of Historic Places. Its frame construction and functional design <br />illustrate an important architectural resource associated with agriculture. <br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 5, 2010 <br />Page 10 of 13 <br />Staff met with the owner's broker to discuss the possible redevelopment of the parcel. <br />Before proceeding with a possible dedication, the City is interested in understanding the <br />structural integrity of the building. The owner has given permission to proceed with the <br />assessment. The Historic Preservation Commission voted unanimously to move <br />forward with the assessment. <br />The site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is therefore <br />automatically eligible for local landmarking per Ordinance No. 1463, Series 2010 <br />Section 15.36.050 C. In discussions with the City Attorney, it was determined the Grain <br />Elevator does qualify for Historic Preservation Fund grant funding because of this <br />eligibility status. <br />A typical technical assessment report provides an exterior inspection noting existing <br />conditions, materials, constructions methods; analysis of structural integrity, including <br />the foundation, structural columns, walls, beams, and roof. It also provides an analysis <br />of character defining features, including the interior, exterior and site and significance of <br />character defining features will be prioritized from high to none and recommendations <br />for rehabilitation will be prioritized with the most urgent or short - range. <br />If approved, Staff will seek additional Historic Preservation Grant dollars to provide an <br />additional $15,000. If authorized Staff will proceed with advertising a Request for <br />Proposals (RFP) for the Historic Structure Assessment of the Louisville Grain Elevator <br />and with the help of a selection committee, which will include Staff and HPC members, <br />will choose the most qualified candidate and bring the contract to City Council along <br />with a final contract amount. <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Councilor Dalton asked if the Historic Preservation Commission had a plan for the <br />property if the assessment proves the structure is capable of being restored. Planning <br />Director Russ explained the opportunity of the study arose when the property was put <br />on the market. Prospective buyers for the property have inquired about the process for <br />its redevelopment. He explained this property would require a platting of the parcel and <br />a 12% public use dedication for a commercial use. The Planning Staff is interested in <br />understanding the structural integrity of the building before determining its ability for <br />reuse. Several ideas have been discussed including restoring it as a museum and reuse <br />as a restaurant or a market. <br />Mayor Sisk voiced his support for the assessment of the Louisville Grain Elevator. He <br />noted the money for the assessment is not in the City's budget. Councilor Muckle <br />voiced his reservation over spending money on property the City does not own, but <br />noted this property has such historic value, he supported the assessment. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.