Laserfiche WebLink
Name <br />Vote <br />Jeff Lipton <br />Yes <br />Chris Pritchard <br />Yes <br />Susan S. Loo <br />Yes <br />Ann O'Connell <br />Yes <br />Monica Sheets <br />Yes <br />Steve Brauneis <br />Yes <br />Scott Russell <br />Yes <br />Motion passed: <br />7 to 0 <br />Resolution No. 24 Roll CaII Vote: <br />Discussion <br />➢ Wall / Window Definition: propos <br />HPC. <br />Russ stated the wall /window discussion ing <br />Commission an opportunity to provide inp • the <br />Commission (HPC). If an amendment is pro <br />Municipal Code (LMC) a public . ng will not <br />Commission it will move directly • , • o City <br />following points of discussion: <br />. There is a need for a better <br />windows. <br />Review of t <br />Review o <br />Discussio <br />Pritchard, L •ton an <br />and un <br />5.36.020 <br />MC amen. : nt request from <br />done o provide t anning <br />is Preservati <br />PC to the Louisville <br />equired by the Planning <br />il. He continued with the <br />n of wall and <br />with modified windows. <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 16, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />osed changes for their clarification <br />changes. <br />are only to provide clarification of the wording <br />Peter S rt, 1132 Je on Ave. member of HPC confirmed this is a <br />clarificatio • he LMC •rding. He suggested the inclusion of the word "door ". <br />Heather Lewi ' ley Ave. discussed the lack of clarity has added time <br />and confusion to - molition review process. <br />Loo asked if conversations have been done with BRaD and DBA for their <br />feedback. <br />Russ stated the Planning Commission is the first presentation. He also stated the <br />use of the word "doors" is included as part of the clarification. <br />Comments from PC members: <br />Sheets, and Brauneis stated their support of the purpose for clarity in the code. <br />Pritchard requested the DBA be contacted. <br />