My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2010 11 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
FINANCE COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2010 Finance Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Finance Committee Agenda and Packet 2010 11 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:34:11 PM
Creation date
12/6/2010 11:11:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
FCPKT 2010 11 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Summary: <br />Louisville, Colorado; General Obligation <br />Credit Profile <br />Louisville GO (MBIA) <br />Unenhanced Rating <br />Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. <br />AA- (SPUR}/Stabe <br />Rationale <br />Standard & Poor's Ratings Services affirmed its 'AA -' underlying rating (SPUR) on Louisville, Colo.'s limited tax <br />GO library bonds. The rating reflects the city's: <br />• Participation in the strong Denver - Boulder MSA; <br />• Very high wealth levels and per capita taxable assessed value for city residents; <br />• Solid financial performance, with strong unrestricted general fund reserves; and <br />• Average direct debt on a per capita basis. <br />Tempering these factors is the city's high direct debt burden as a percent of market value. <br />Affirmed <br />The bonds are secured by the city's limited GO pledge, to be paid from a limited mill levy up to a maximum rate of <br />1.581 on all taxable property within the city. Should the taxes collected from this levy not be sufficient to cover debt <br />service, the city has pledged to snake payments from any other legally available revenues. <br />Located 20 miles northwest of Denver and 10 miles southeast of Boulder, Louisville enjoys easy access to I -36, the <br />main northlsouth transportation corridor through this sizable and economically strong MSA. The city's residents <br />(19,379 in 2006) have access to employment in both Denver and Boulder as well as along the growing industrial <br />and technology corridor in between. The city is essentially built out, but reports continued strong growth in the real <br />estate industry. Income indicators are very high, with median household effective buying income (EBI) and per <br />capita EBI at 158% and 153% of national levels, respectively. In addition, the total actual market value per capita is <br />above average at $136,000. Total taxable value in the city reached $423.3 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of <br />23% since fiscal 2003. Boulder County's unemployment rate of 3.7% is below state and national averages of 4.3% <br />and 4.6 %, respectively. <br />Louisville's general financial performance has been good, with consistently high fund balances and good surpluses. <br />The city's 2006 general fund balance was $3.7 million, or 29% of expenditures, a slight increase from the 2006 <br />balance of $3.4 million, or 27% of expenditures. The city posted surpluses of $242,000 and $559,000 in 2006 and <br />2005, respectively. Furthermore, management expects to end 2007 with an increased general fund balance of $4.6 <br />million, or 36% of expenditures. Like most Colorado cities, Louisville is somewhat dependent on sales and use tax <br />revenues for general city operations, with 46% of total general fund revenues generated from this source in fiscal <br />2006. Although the sales tax dropped in 2005, it has since flattened our. <br />The district's management practices are considered 'standard' under Standard & Poor's Financial Management <br />Assessment (FMA). An FMA of 'standard' indicates that the finance department maintains adequate policies in <br />some, but not all, key areas. Significant components include a 15% minimum reserves policy and an investment <br />Standard & Poor's RatingsDirect 1 December 12, 2007 <br />Standard '& Poor's. All rights reserved Nu reprint or dissemination without S&Ps permission Seeir of Use /Disclaimer on the last page_ <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.