My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2024 02 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2024 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2024 02 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2024 6:23:06 PM
Creation date
5/8/2024 12:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/6/2024
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 6, 2024 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />The code requires a minimum 12% public land dedication. Of the 390 acres in this <br />proposal, 81 acres are exempt from the requirement. Therefore the minimum dedication <br />required is 37.1 acres; the applicant is proposal dedicating 139 acres of public land. <br />Director Zuccaro reviewed the dedication in detail. In working with the applicant, staff <br />asked the applicant to consider many factors including: does it cover relatively <br />undisturbed areas of land; does it follow natural drainageways with habitat; is it <br />continuous with other open spaces; and does it buffer existing residential development. <br />Director Zuccaro reviewed the road and trail plan noting the extension of Campus Drive <br />to 96t" Street and possible trail connections. Staff is recommending a condition that the <br />applicant and the Northwest Parkway have a final agreement in place before the City <br />considers the final plat. <br />He reviewed the proposed road layout and traffic analysis at full build out. The study <br />finds 75% of the anticipated traffic would come and go from the Northwest Parkway and <br />US 36 with a smaller percent from City streets. Upgrades to the Northwest Parkway and <br />US 36 will need to be addressed long term with the regional agencies. <br />He reviewed the grading, drainage, and utility plans. There are six regional detention <br />ponds proposed; a new lift station would be needed and built by the applicant; and <br />upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant would be needed in future stages of <br />development. <br />Director Zuccaro reviewed the transportation demand management plan which is <br />required by the 2010 zoning agreement. He also reviewed the sustainability <br />commitments which staff will require in the subdivision agreement and PUD approvals. <br />He reviewed the municipal code's specific approval criteria for a subdivision plat <br />including conformation with Title 16, whether it complies with the Comprehensive Plan, <br />and the zoning requirements. Staff finds the application does comply with all of the <br />requirements and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The Parks and Public Landscaping Advisory Board reviewed the application and <br />recommended approval. The Open Space Advisory Board (OSAB) recommended <br />approval with conditions including requiring a commitment to rehabilitate and dedicate <br />the Paradise Lane properties; requiring the applicant use City standards for underpass <br />design; that OSAB participate in the PUD review process; and that the applicant to <br />consider a third underpass at Rockress Drive/NW Parkway. The Planning Commission <br />reviewed the application across six meetings and voted 3-2 to recommend denial. <br />Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1) prior to the City Council <br />hearing on the final plat, the applicant shall provide final approval from the NW Parkway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.