My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2024 02 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2024 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2024 02 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2024 6:23:06 PM
Creation date
5/8/2024 12:04:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/6/2024
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 6, 2024 <br />Page 7of14 <br />This proposal includes 135 dwelling units and 4,000 sf of retail space. Post noted the <br />following areas of consideration for Council: <br />The applicant will request consideration of a waiver to the maximum residential <br />density of 20 units/acre allowed in the MU-R zone district. The applicant is <br />requesting 25 units/acre. The applicant asserts that permitting more units on site <br />will allow the development to include inclusionary housing pursuant to the <br />requirements the municipal code. <br />The applicant will request consideration of a Special Review Use to allow a <br />larger -than -permitted building footprint .The maximum ground floor building <br />footprint in the MU-R zone district is 10,000 square feet — the proposed <br />apartment is +/- 30,000 square feet. <br />The applicant may request consideration of a waiver to the block design and <br />dimension standards in the design guidelines. <br />Planner Post stated the applicant has indicated that providing the total number of <br />required inclusionary units on -site may be a challenge with current density limitations <br />and Energy Code requirements. <br />He stated that when a formal application is submitted there will be opportunities for <br />public comment at both the Planning Commission and City Council. Staff has not made <br />any recommendations on this Concept Plan. The City Council may provide non -binding, <br />advisory feedback to the applicant. <br />Hunter Floyd, Live Forward Development, reviewed their proposal. He stated they build <br />high -impact, low intensity housing on infill sites. They envision a mixed use <br />development for this site. He reviewed the community engagement they have <br />completed. From that they learned of the neighborhood concerns about the site and <br />their requests for more green space, walkability, affordable housing, and amenities. <br />He discussed the conceptual plan for the site, some of the highlights of the project, and <br />their plans for sustainability on the site. He reviewed each of the waivers they will likely <br />ask for related to building area, building height, density, commercial space sizing, the <br />Net Zero building code, and affordable housing. <br />Councilmember Kern asked if meeting the local code will be difficult. Floyd stated that <br />meeting the net zero code is very challenging and will increase the rent about 10%. The <br />costs don't pencil out financially so it may mean they need residents who choose to live <br />in a more sustainable building and pay more for it. <br />Councilmember Hoefner asked if more density could make the net zero affordable. <br />Floyd stated that probably wouldn't be enough to help which is why they are asking for <br />the waiver. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.