My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 04 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2024 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2024 04 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2024 6:34:58 PM
Creation date
5/9/2024 11:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/11/2024
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 8, 2024 <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />Baskett said that she was in support with the proposed conditions <br />Moline said that he was in support with the proposed conditions. <br />Hunt said that she was in support with the proposed conditions and reiterated that there <br />was value in following the state guidelines. <br />Bangs said that he was in support with the proposed conditions. He added that it would <br />be interesting to see how many of the EV ready spots would later be converted to EV <br />installed. <br />Brauneis said that he was in support with the proposed conditions. <br />Brauneis reiterated that the four proposed conditions were that level 2 chargers be <br />installed, that EV installed spaces for multi -family dwellings be increased from 0 to 5%, <br />that the value additions were inclusive of the lower value options, and that the future <br />reserved circuits for EV capable spaces be labeled as such. <br />Choi moved to approve Resolution 1, Series 2024 with the proposed conditions, and was <br />seconded by Hunt. The motion was adopted by a vote of 7 to 0. <br />d. Comprehensive Plan Update — Project introduction, process, and initial targeted <br />questions to inform next step (1:22:00) <br />Staff Presentation: <br />Hirt introduced the presentation for the comprehensive plan update. He said that the <br />intention was to give commissioners understanding of what the comp plan was, and what <br />it entailed. He noted that it was required by state law and by city code to be updated every <br />10 years. He discussed what it covered and the sections that were to be included in it. <br />The "Vision and Values" section would include a lot of community engagement, as staff <br />wanted the plan to reflect community priorities. He noted that there were 3 proposed <br />community engagement windows to gather feedback. <br />Jessica Garrow and Alison Cotey gave a presentation on behalf of the consulting team. <br />They highlighted some of the plans they had recently completed for other municipalities <br />in Colorado, and noted the experience they had in completing this kind of project. <br />Hirt outlined the proposed schedule for the plan. He said that it was expected to take <br />around 18 months, and that they wanted to undertake community engagement during the <br />summer months to maximize the response rate. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. <br />Brauneis said that the plan should reflect community desires, be understandable, and be <br />actionable for the planning department. <br />Choi said that the consultant group were very good. He agreed with Brauneis' <br />assessment and said that it provided opportunity to find what was next. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.