My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2010 09 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2010 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2010 09 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:44:30 PM
Creation date
12/23/2010 4:41:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/21/2010
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2010 09 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> September 21 2010 <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br /> RESOLUTION No. 55, SERIES 2010 A RESOLUTION OF THE LOUISVILLE CITY <br /> COUNCIL URGING LOUISVILLE CITIZENS TO VOTE NO ON PROPOSITION 101, <br /> AMENDMENT 60 AND AMENDMENT 61 ON THE NOVEMBER 2, 2010 STATEWIDE <br /> BALLOT, CONCERNING RESTRICTION OF STATE AND LOCAL REVENUES <br /> Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. <br /> Deputy City Manager Balser explained Proposition 101, Amendment 60 and <br /> Amendment 61 on the November 2, 2010 ballot would severely restrict the City's <br /> operations and services. Resolution No. 55, Series 2010 urges Louisville voters to vote <br /> no on Proposition 101 and Amendments 60 and 61. The highlights of the ballot <br /> proposals are as follows: <br /> Statewide Proposition #101 reduces vehicle income and telecommunications tax <br /> revenues. <br /> Constitutional Amendment #60 limits property taxes <br /> Constitutional Amendment #61 limits state and local government <br /> The Colorado Municipal League (CML) prepared a template for municipalities to gauge <br /> what impact the measures would have on their revenues. Finance Director Watson <br /> used the templates and made the following determinations: <br /> Should Proposition #101 pass, Staff projects the reduction in revenues to the City <br /> would be $1,119,434 in 2011 to $1,498,745 by 2014. <br /> Staff projects the approval of Amendment #60 would reduce revenue to the City <br /> by $378,798 annually beginning in 2011. <br /> The impacts of Amendment #61 are difficult to project but certainly would <br /> negatively affect the City's ability to debt finance capital projects within Louisville. <br /> Staff recommended approval of Resolution No. 55, Series 2010. <br /> COUNCIL COMMENT <br /> Mayor Sisk stated Amendment #61 limits local government from loans longer than ten <br /> years. Amendment #60 would limit de- brucing by only allowing increases to property <br /> taxes every ten years. He noted the City's mill levy is the lowest in Boulder County. <br /> Proposition #101 would greatly affect road improvements and transportation funding. <br /> He voiced his opposition to all three ballot issues. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Marsella urged the public to read the Council packet to understand the <br /> negative impacts to City's budget should these three ballot questions pass. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.